Clinimetric Properties of Outcome Measures in Bronchiectasis

医学 支气管扩张 肺活量测定 恶化 生活质量(医疗保健) 物理疗法 肺功能测试 前瞻性队列研究 肺活量 肺功能 内科学 扩散能力 哮喘 护理部
作者
J.M. Bradley,Kathryn M. Ferguson,Andrew Bailey,Katherine O’Neill,Rebecca McLeese,Adam T. Hill,Michael R. Loebinger,Mary Carroll,James D. Chalmers,Timothy Gatheral,Christopher Johnson,Anthony De Soyza,John R. Hurst,D.G. Downey,J. Stuart Elborn
出处
期刊:Annals of the American Thoracic Society [American Thoracic Society]
卷期号:20 (5): 648-659
标识
DOI:10.1513/annalsats.202206-493oc
摘要

Rationale: There is a lack of outcome measures with robust clinimetric properties in bronchiectasis. Objectives: To determine the clinimetric properties (reliability over 1 year during clinical stability and responsiveness over the course of antibiotics for pulmonary exacerbation) of objective and patient-reported outcome measures. Methods: This multicenter cohort study included adults with bronchiectasis from seven hospitals in the United Kingdom. Participants attended four visits, 4 months apart over 1 year while clinically stable and at the beginning and end of exacerbation and completed lung function (spirometry and multiple breath washout), provided a blood sample for C-reactive protein (CRP) measurement, and completed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires (Quality of Life-Bronchiectasis, St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire, and EuroQoL 5-Dimensions 5-Levels). Results: Participants (n = 132) had a mean (standard deviation) age of 66 (11) years, and 64% were female. Lung function parameters (forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1], standard lung clearance index [LCI2.5]) were reliable over time [coefficient of variation (CV): <10%]). Regarding responsiveness, FEV1 demonstrated better properties than LCI2.5; therefore, a clear justification for the use of LCI2.5 in future trials is needed. CRP was less reliable (CV > 20%) over time than FEV1 and LCI2.5, and whereas CRP had a large mean change between the start and end of an exacerbation, this may have been driven by a small number of patients having a large change in CRP. Reliability of HRQoL questionnaires and questionnaire domains ranged from acceptable (CV: 20–30%) to good (CV: 10–20%), and HRQoL were responsive to treatment of exacerbations. Considering the specific questionnaire domain relevant to the intervention and its associated clinimetric properties is important. Additional statistics will support future power and/or sample size analysis. Conclusions: This information on the clinimetric properties of lung function parameters, CRP, and HRQoL parameters should be used to inform the choice of outcome measures used in future bronchiectasis trials.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
nannan发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
谨慎芙完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
Tonald Yang发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
He完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
闪烁发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
fff关闭了fff文献求助
3秒前
殇唛发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
SciGPT应助文献互助1采纳,获得10
5秒前
Kevin发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
紫金大萝卜应助Singularity采纳,获得20
7秒前
852应助谨慎芙采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
A_Brute应助YanyanLiu采纳,获得10
8秒前
WZC发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
Tequila完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
FashionBoy应助nova采纳,获得10
11秒前
iVANPENNY应助阿拉采纳,获得10
12秒前
乐乐应助Migaler采纳,获得30
12秒前
烟花应助nannan采纳,获得10
12秒前
ICY发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
月亮发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
哈哈发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
珊珊来迟发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
WZC完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
SOLOMON应助MuMu采纳,获得30
16秒前
16秒前
高分求助中
Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 4 Volume Set (ASM Books) 13th Edition 1000
Cross-Cultural Psychology: Critical Thinking and Contemporary Applications (8th edition) 800
Counseling With Immigrants, Refugees, and Their Families From Social Justice Perspectives pages 800
マンネンタケ科植物由来メロテルペノイド類の網羅的全合成/Collective Synthesis of Meroterpenoids Derived from Ganoderma Family 500
[Lambert-Eaton syndrome without calcium channel autoantibodies] 400
Statistical Procedures for the Medical Device Industry 400
藍からはじまる蛍光性トリプタンスリン研究 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2375542
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2083448
关于积分的说明 5225053
捐赠科研通 1810470
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 903685
版权声明 558428
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 482392