Growth and Clinical Impact of 6-mm or Larger Subsolid Nodules after 5 Years of Stability at Chest CT

Background It remains unclear whether 5 years of stability is sufficient to establish the benign behavior of subsolid nodules (SSNs) of the lung. There are no guidelines for the length of follow-up needed for these SSNs. Purpose To investigate the incidence of interval growth of pulmonary SSNs 6 mm or greater in diameter after 5 years of stability and their clinical outcome. Materials and Methods This retrospective study assessed SSNs 6 mm or greater that were stable for 5 years after detection (January 2002 to December 2018). The incidence of interval growth after 5 years of stability and the clinical and radiologic features of these SSNs were investigated. Clinical stage shifts of growing SSNs, presence of metastasis, and overall survival were assessed during the follow-up period. Subgroup analysis was performed in patients with nonenhanced thin-section (section thickness ≤1.5 mm) CT for interval growth after 5 years of stability. Results A total of 235 SSNs in 235 patients (mean age, 64 years ± 10 [standard deviation]; 132 women) were evaluated. There were 212 pure ground-glass nodules and 24 part-solid nodules. During follow-up (median, 112 months; range, 84-208 months), five of the 235 SSNs (2%; three primary ground-glass nodules and two part-solid nodules) showed interval growth. Three of these five growing SSNs were 10 mm or greater. Three of the five SSNs with interval growth had clinical stage shifts after growth (from Tis [in situ] to T1mi [minimally invasive] in one lesion; from T1mi to T1a in two lesions). There were no deaths or metastases from lung cancer during follow-up. Of 160 SSNs imaged with section thickness of 1.5 mm or less, two (1%) grew; both lesions were 10 mm or greater. Conclusion Only 2% of subsolid pulmonary nodules greater than or equal to 6 mm that had been stable for 5 years showed subsequent growth. At median follow-up of 9 years (after the initial 5-year period of stability), growth of those lung nodules had no clinical effect. © RSNA, 2020 See also the editorial by Naidich and Azour in this issue.