爱荷华赌博任务
哈姆德
内科学
焦虑
医学
萧条(经济学)
认知
生活质量(医疗保健)
疾病
评定量表
临床心理学
心理学
物理疗法
精神科
发展心理学
经济
宏观经济学
护理部
作者
Shenshen Zhang,Lihong Wu,Boyu Zhang,Yuanrong Zhu,Yin‐Guang Fan,Qiao Wang,Xiangpeng Hu,Yanghua Tian
标识
DOI:10.1080/13803395.2020.1802406
摘要
Introduction The cognitive processing in patients with functional dyspepsia (FD) has not been well established. Decision-making is an important component of cognitive function. Most brain regions involved in decision-making are abnormal in FD patients. This study aimed to investigate the decision-making under ambiguity and risk in FD patients.Methods We recruited 40 FD patients meeting Rome III criteria and 40 healthy controls (HCs) matched for age, sex, marital status, and education level. The Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) and the 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17) were used to evaluate their anxiety and depression emotions. The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and Game of Dice Task (GDT) were used to evaluate decision-making under ambiguity and risk, respectively. Helicobacter pylori status, disease duration, dyspeptic symptom score, and the Nepean Dyspepsia Life Quality Index (NDLQI) were obtained from all patients.Results In IGT, FD patients had a lower total net score, chose more adverse choices, and showed a slower response to change their behavior than HCs. However, there was no significant difference in the net score of the first 2 blocks between the two groups. In GDT, FD patients had a lower total net score, higher risk score, and lower use of negative feedback than HCs. In addition, FD patients showed better GDT performance than those without early satiation.Conclusions FD patients showed impaired decision-making under risk. The deficiency might be related to dyspeptic symptoms of FD patients.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI