医学
四分位间距
心脏病学
内科学
冠状动脉
狭窄
烧蚀
动脉
作者
Adetola Ladejobi,Georgios Christopoulos,Nicholas Y. Tan,Thomas P. Ladas,Jason Tri,Martin van Zyl,Omar Yasin,Alan Sugrue,Mariam Khabsa,Darrin Uecker,Richard J. Connolly,David J. Danitz,Christopher V. DeSimone,Ammar M. Killu,Elad Maor,David R. Holmes,Samuel J. Asirvatham,Freddy Del‐Carpio Munoz
标识
DOI:10.1161/circep.121.010668
摘要
BACKGROUND: Previous animal studies have shown no significant vascular injury from pulsed electrical field (PEF) ablation. We sought to assess the effect of PEF on swine coronary arteries. METHODS: We performed intracoronary and epicardial (near the coronary artery) PEF ablations in swine pretreated with dual antiplatelet and antiarrhythmic therapy. Intracoronary PEF was delivered using MapiT catheters (Biotronik, Berlin), whereas epicardial PEF was delivered using EPT catheters (Boston Scientific, MA). PEF pulse duration was microseconds (Nanoknife 3.0, Angio Dynamics, NY) or nanoseconds (CellFX, Pulse Biosciences, CA). RESULTS: =0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In the swine model, intracoronary PEF resulted both in significant coronary spasm and fixed coronary stenosis. Epicardial PEF, delivered at lower energy, resulted in reversible spasm but no fixed coronary stenosis.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI