Dispensing error rates in pharmacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 荟萃分析 奇纳 梅德林 药店 等级间信度 急诊医学 内科学 家庭医学 统计 心理干预 精神科 政治学 数学 评定量表 法学
作者
Irene S. Um,Alexander J. Clough,Edwin C.K. Tan
出处
期刊:Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:20 (1): 1-9 被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.10.003
摘要

Dispensing errors can cause preventable patient harm such as adverse drug events, hospitalisation, or death. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature and quantify the global prevalence of dispensing errors across pharmacy settings. Electronic databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CINAHL were searched between January 2010 and September 2023. Studies published in English, from all pharmacy settings, with data that could be used to calculate the prevalence of dispensing errors were included. Studies were excluded if they did not report true dispensing errors. Data including study characteristics and dispensing error characteristics were extracted. The quality of the studies was assessed using 10 criteria. Random-effects meta-analysis was employed to estimate pooled prevalences and heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic. Subgroup analyses were performed according to sample size, study design, setting, error identification method, location, and study quality. PROSPERO: CRD42020197860. Of the 4216 articles, 62 studies were included. Hospital was the most common pharmacy setting (n = 44, 71.0%) and 15 studies were based in the community. The type of denominator used to report dispensing errors varied between studies, such as dispensed items (n = 45, 72.6%), doses (n = 7, 11.3%), or patients (n = 5, 8.1%). The prevalence of dispensing errors ranged from 0 to 33.3% (n = 62 studies with 64 prevalence estimates). The pooled prevalence for dispensing errors across all studies was 1.6% (95% CI 1.2%–2.1%, I2 = 100%). A majority of studies were of moderate methodological quality (n = 36, 58.1%) and interrater reliability was applied in eight studies. The worldwide prevalence of dispensing errors was 1.6% across community, hospital and other pharmacy settings. This varied depending on the type of denominator used, study design and how the error was identified. This review highlights the need for consistent definitions and standardised classifications of dispensing errors worldwide to reduce heterogeneity.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
1秒前
科研通AI5应助Zhangll采纳,获得10
1秒前
distant发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
qiuyang完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
英姑应助顺心从霜采纳,获得10
3秒前
小马甲应助韩梦采纳,获得10
3秒前
佰斯特威应助LMH采纳,获得10
3秒前
daixan89发布了新的文献求助100
4秒前
4秒前
JOKER完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
ccalvintan完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
英姑应助qiuyang采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
Lucas应助云深不知处采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
王世杰完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
orixero应助ty1996采纳,获得10
9秒前
孙兴燕发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
小铃铛发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
脑洞疼应助小Z采纳,获得30
11秒前
XIU发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
CuO关闭了CuO文献求助
11秒前
熊健钧发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
fufu完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
黎音完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
泯珉发布了新的文献求助30
13秒前
14秒前
able完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Nuclear Fuel Behaviour under RIA Conditions 500
Sociologies et cosmopolitisme méthodologique 400
Why America Can't Retrench (And How it Might) 400
Another look at Archaeopteryx as the oldest bird 390
Higher taxa of Basidiomycetes 300
Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 3.0 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 催化作用 遗传学 冶金 电极 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4665285
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4046457
关于积分的说明 12515896
捐赠科研通 3738986
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2064970
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1094476
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 974883