Conducting replication in translation and interpreting studies

Abstract Replication has the potential to substantiate tentative research claims and consolidate the existing evidence base. Translation and interpreting (T&I) scholars have argued for the need for replication and generated initial data on practices and attitudes towards replication. In three inter-linked studies described in this article, we shed further light on how replication is perceived, practiced, and expected by relevant stakeholders. We find that (a) most of the T&I journal editors surveyed support replication, but give lower priority to direct replication; (b) the overall prevalence rate of replication was 0.6% among 3807 research articles published in eleven leading T&I journals (2000–2022), and most of the identified replications were partial replication; and (c) the majority of the T&I researchers who participated in this research expected their study to be replicated based on various alterations. These findings help us develop an enhanced understanding of replication and formulate strategies to promote replication in empirical T&I studies.