随机对照试验
基于正念的减压
应对(心理学)
应力降低
医学
心理健康
注意
临床心理学
门诊部
生活质量(医疗保健)
物理疗法
主题分析
压力源
干预(咨询)
精神科
治疗组和对照组
自闭症
心理干预
感知压力量表
单盲板
心理学
回避应对
重复措施设计
随机分配
自闭症谱系障碍
压力管理
社会支持
临床试验
作者
Tatja Hirvikoski,Hanna Agius,Gustaf Wettermark,Carina Eriksdotter,Anne-Kristiina Luoto,Nitya Jayaram‐Lindström,Sven Bölte
标识
DOI:10.1177/25739581251400582
摘要
Background: Autistic adults often experience high levels of stress and difficulties in coping with stressors in everyday life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) groups, adjusted for autistic adults in an outpatient context. Methods: We conducted a two-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled effectiveness trial during the years 2018–2020. Autistic adults ( N = 77) were recruited from outpatient services and randomized to either MBSR ( n = 39) or treatment as usual, TAU (i.e., continued regular services, n = 38). We used linear mixed models with random intercept to analyze the effects of intervention on self-rated perceived stress (primary outcome), as well as mental health, mindfulness skills, quality of life, and autism acceptance (secondary outcomes). In addition, we collected qualitative data at exit discussions in the MBSR groups and examined the transcription using thematic content analysis. Results: Participants (52% female) had a mean age of 40 years, with a majority being unemployed at the time of inclusion (64.9%) and having at least one co-occurring psychiatric diagnosis (87%). The completion rate in the MBSR group was 81%. A comparison of the slopes of the two groups showed a greater reduction of perceived stress from pre- to postintervention in the MBSR group than in the TAU group (Perceived Stress Scale total score: between-group effect size d = 0.55 [0.20–0.90] at postintervention and d = 0.61 [0.13–1.10] at the 3-month follow-up). Likewise, symptoms of mental health problems decreased more in the MBSR group (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale total score: between group d = 0.64 [0.23–1.05] at postintervention and d = 0.70 [0.14–1.26] at the 3-month follow-up). No changes in autism acceptance or general quality of life were observed in this study. Qualitative analysis indicated that participants perceived the MBSR group as inclusive and safe. Moreover, they appreciated both the conveyance of mindfulness techniques and the change in their approach (a “new mindset”) regarding stress. The participants also reflected on the challenges of continued practice after completed intervention. Conclusions: The MBSR groups for autistic adults may be an effective intervention in a clinical context. Future studies should examine the facilitators and barriers for the long-term maintenance of the acquired benefits.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI