Tularemia as a Biological Weapon

土拉热病 医学 生物战 病毒学 毒理 生物
作者
David T. Dennis,Thomas V. Inglesby,Donald A. Henderson,John G. Bartlett,Michael S. Ascher,Edward M. Eitzen,Anne D. Fine,Arthur M. Friedlander,Jerome Hauer,Marcelle Layton,Scott R. Lillibridge,Joseph E. McDade,Michael T. Osterholm,Tara O’Toole,Gerald Parker,Trish M. Perl,Philip K. Russell,Kevin Tonat,for the Working Group on Civilian Biodefense
出处
期刊:JAMA [American Medical Association]
卷期号:285 (21): 2763-2763 被引量:1378
标识
DOI:10.1001/jama.285.21.2763
摘要

The Working Group on Civilian Biodefense has developed consensus-based recommendations for measures to be taken by medical and public health professionals if tularemia is used as a biological weapon against a civilian population.The working group included 25 representatives from academic medical centers, civilian and military governmental agencies, and other public health and emergency management institutions and agencies.MEDLINE databases were searched from January 1966 to October 2000, using the Medical Subject Headings Francisella tularensis, Pasteurella tularensis, biological weapon, biological terrorism, bioterrorism, biological warfare, and biowarfare. Review of these references led to identification of relevant materials published prior to 1966. In addition, participants identified other references and sources.Three formal drafts of the statement that synthesized information obtained in the formal evidence-gathering process were reviewed by members of the working group. Consensus was achieved on the final draft.A weapon using airborne tularemia would likely result 3 to 5 days later in an outbreak of acute, undifferentiated febrile illness with incipient pneumonia, pleuritis, and hilar lymphadenopathy. Specific epidemiological, clinical, and microbiological findings should lead to early suspicion of intentional tularemia in an alert health system; laboratory confirmation of agent could be delayed. Without treatment, the clinical course could progress to respiratory failure, shock, and death. Prompt treatment with streptomycin, gentamicin, doxycycline, or ciprofloxacin is recommended. Prophylactic use of doxycycline or ciprofloxacin may be useful in the early postexposure period.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
蓝兰完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
gggja完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
吕小n发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
酷波er应助yehuiyu采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
迅速皮带发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
爱听歌的纸鹤完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
Rico发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
8秒前
9秒前
FashionBoy应助Gloria采纳,获得10
9秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
SciGPT应助小菜鸟采纳,获得10
10秒前
xxxx完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
小狒狒完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
12秒前
情怀应助177采纳,获得10
13秒前
yehuiyu发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
顾矜应助加油采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
xxxx发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
领导范儿应助吕小n采纳,获得10
16秒前
cd完成签到,获得积分20
16秒前
16秒前
嘉辰完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
19秒前
嘟嘟发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
Hillary完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
洗面奶完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
24秒前
24秒前
24秒前
25秒前
修越完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
在水一方应助zpx采纳,获得10
27秒前
梅里猫发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
慕辰完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Social Work Ethics Casebook(2nd,Frederic G. R) 600
A novel angiographic index for predicting the efficacy of drug-coated balloons in small vessels 500
Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation ® 500
The Affinity Designer Manual - Version 2: A Step-by-Step Beginner's Guide 500
Affinity Designer Essentials: A Complete Guide to Vector Art: Your Ultimate Handbook for High-Quality Vector Graphics 500
Optimisation de cristallisation en solution de deux composés organiques en vue de leur purification 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5087432
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4302757
关于积分的说明 13408674
捐赠科研通 4128124
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2260695
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1264889
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1199204