An Indirect Treatment Comparison of Semaglutide 2.0 mg vs Dulaglutide 3.0 mg and 4.5 mg Using Multilevel Network Meta-regression

赛马鲁肽 杜拉鲁肽 医学 优势比 2型糖尿病 荟萃分析 糖化血红素 内科学 内分泌学 糖尿病 艾塞那肽 利拉鲁肽
作者
Ildiko Lingvay,Robert Bauer,James Baker‐Knight,Jack Lawson,Richard E. Pratley
出处
期刊:The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:107 (5): 1461-1469 被引量:9
标识
DOI:10.1210/clinem/dgab905
摘要

Abstract Aims Currently, no head-to-head data are available comparing semaglutide 2.0 mg with dulaglutide 3.0 mg or 4.5 mg. We conducted an indirect treatment comparison (ITC) of their effects on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight in patients with type 2 diabetes. Materials and methods Multilevel network meta-regression was conducted, based on a connected evidence network of published results from the A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Dulaglutide (LY2189265) in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes 11 trial and individual patient data from the A Research Study to Compare Two Doses of Semaglutide Taken Once Weekly in People With Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN) and SUSTAIN 7 trials. Results Semaglutide 2.0 mg significantly reduced HbA1c vs dulaglutide 3.0 mg and 4.5 mg, with estimated treatment differences (ETDs) of –0.44% points (95% credible interval [CrI], –0.68 to –0.19) and –0.28% points (95% CrI, –0.52 to –0.03), respectively. Semaglutide 2.0 mg also significantly reduced body weight vs dulaglutide 3.0 mg and 4.5 mg with ETDs of –3.29 kg (95% CrI, –4.62 to −1.96) and –2.57 kg (95% CrI, –3.90 to –1.24), respectively. Odds of achieving HbA1c < 7.0% were significantly greater for semaglutide 2.0 vs dulaglutide 3.0 mg (odds ratio [OR]: 2.23 [95% CrI, 1.15-3.90]), whereas this did not reach significance for semaglutide 2.0 mg vs dulaglutide 4.5 mg (OR: 1.58 [95% CrI, 0.82-2.78]). Sensitivity analyses supported the main analysis findings. Conclusions This ITC demonstrated significantly greater reductions from baseline in HbA1c and body weight with semaglutide 2.0 mg vs dulaglutide 3.0 mg and 4.5 mg. The findings of this study provide important comparative effectiveness information until randomized head-to-head studies become available.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
笑点低歌曲完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
yunxiao发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
wch666发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
慕青应助ZYY采纳,获得10
4秒前
lossa发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Jennifer发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
8秒前
9秒前
11秒前
Carol完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
小木林完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
CC_200209发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
sun完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
Jennifer完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
kyo发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
小二郎应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
852应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
SciGPT应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
香蕉觅云应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
华仔应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
情怀应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
ZG发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
幺儿小桃酥完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
妮妮完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
延胡索发布了新的文献求助20
24秒前
1178067194完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
26秒前
27秒前
27秒前
XXX完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
30秒前
31秒前
asp发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
研友_LBRPOL完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
怀玉发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
Ava应助延胡索采纳,获得10
32秒前
33秒前
高分求助中
(禁止应助)【重要!!请各位详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Semantics for Latin: An Introduction 1099
Biology of the Indian Stingless Bee: Tetragonula iridipennis Smith 1000
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 760
2024-2030年中国石英材料行业市场竞争现状及未来趋势研判报告 500
镇江南郊八公洞林区鸟类生态位研究 500
Thermal Quadrupoles: Solving the Heat Equation through Integral Transforms 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4147535
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3684272
关于积分的说明 11640270
捐赠科研通 3378125
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1853944
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 916317
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 830251