系统回顾
质量(理念)
过程(计算)
梅德林
系统过程
管理科学
医学
数据科学
计算机科学
工程伦理学
心理学
工程类
政治学
在制品
认识论
运营管理
法学
哲学
操作系统
作者
Madhukar Pai,Michael McCulloch,Jennifer D. Gorman,Nitika Pant Pai,Wayne Enanoria,Gail Kennedy,Prathap Tharyan,John M. Colford
出处
期刊:PubMed
日期:2004-05-15
卷期号:17 (2): 86-95
被引量:119
摘要
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses synthesize data from existing primary research, and well-conducted reviews offer clinicians a practical solution to the problem of staying current in their fields of interest. A whole generation of secondary journals, pre-appraised evidence libraries and periodically updated electronic texts are now available to clinicians. However, not all systematic reviews are of high quality, and it is important to be able to critically assess their validity and applicability. This article is an illustrated guide for conducting systematic reviews. A clear understanding of the process will provide clinicians with the tools to judiciously appraise reviews and interpret them. We hope that it will enable clinicians to conduct systematic reviews, generate high-quality evidence, and contribute to the evidence-based medicine movement.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI