医学
富血小板血浆
系统回顾
肌腱
肌腱病
科克伦图书馆
康复
运动医学
韧带
梅德林
物理疗法
荟萃分析
外科
内科学
血小板
政治学
法学
作者
Mario Cruciani,Massimo Franchini,Carlo Mengoli,Giuseppe Marano,Ilaria Pati,Francesca Masiello,Samantha Profili,Eva Veropalumbo,Simonetta Pupella,Stefania Vaglio,Giancarlo M Liumbruno
出处
期刊:PubMed
日期:2019-11-01
卷期号:17 (6): 465-478
被引量:23
摘要
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been used in different non-transfusion indications due to its role in tissue regeneration and healing. The aim of this overview of systematic reviews (umbrella review) is to provide a summary of the existing research syntheses related to PRP use for sports-related muscle, tendon and ligament injuries.Literature searches were performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library to identify systematic reviews focusing on PRP use for sports-related muscle, tendon and ligament injuries. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the checklist for systematic reviews and research syntheses developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute and the GRADE assessment.Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Five studies evaluated PRP use for acute muscle injury, and 17 evaluated PRP use for tendon and ligament injury. Studies were heterogeneous in terms of the dose and number of PRP injections, and the control groups. Three of the 5 reviews evaluating acute muscle injury concluded that PRP had no effect on the outcomes considered. One review shows superior efficacy of rehabilitation exercise compared to PRP. One review shows that PRP may result in an earlier return to sport for acute grade I-II injury. Eight out of the 17 reviews evaluating PRP for tendon and ligament injuries show a statistically significant (p<0.05) difference in pain and/or function outcome measures favouring PRP compared to controls, although most of the observed differences were small. Adverse events data and quality of life outcomes were rarely analysed or reported in the included studies and were considered clinically insignificant.In most of the included reviews, the available evidence was judged to be of low/very low quality due to risk of bias, inconsistency and imprecision, thus making the level of certainty of these findings low and not adequate to support the general use of PRP in this setting.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI