索拉非尼
医学
肝细胞癌
选择性内照射治疗
内科学
危险系数
不利影响
临床终点
人口
门静脉血栓形成
放射治疗
胃肠病学
肿瘤科
外科
随机对照试验
置信区间
血栓形成
环境卫生
作者
Pierce K. H. Chow,Mihir Gandhi,Say-Beng Tan,Khin Maung Win,Ariunaa Khasbazar,Janus P. Ong,Su Pin Choo,Peng Chung Cheow,Chanisa Chotipanich,Kieron Lim,Laurentius A. Lesmana,Tjakra Wibawa Manuaba,Boon Koon Yoong,Aloysius Raj,Chiong Soon Law,Ian H.Y.,Rolley Rey Lobo,Catherine Teh,Yun Hwan Kim,Yun Won Jong
标识
DOI:10.1200/jco.2017.76.0892
摘要
Purpose Selective internal radiation therapy or radioembolization (RE) shows efficacy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) limited to the liver. This study compared the safety and efficacy of RE and sorafenib in patients with locally advanced HCC. Patients and Methods SIRveNIB (selective internal radiation therapy v sorafenib), an open-label, investigator-initiated, phase III trial, compared yttrium-90 ( 90 Y) resin microspheres RE with sorafenib 800 mg/d in patients with locally advanced HCC in a two-tailed study designed for superiority/detriment. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 and stratified by center and presence of portal vein thrombosis. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Efficacy analyses were performed in the intention-to-treat population and safety analyses in the treated population. Results A total of 360 patients were randomly assigned (RE, 182; sorafenib, 178) from 11 countries in the Asia-Pacific region. In the RE and sorafenib groups, 28.6% and 9.0%, respectively, failed to receive assigned therapy without significant cross-over to either group. Median OS was 8.8 and 10.0 months with RE and sorafenib, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.4; P = .36). A total of 1,468 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were reported (RE, 437; sorafenib, 1,031). Significantly fewer patients in the RE than sorafenib group had grade ≥ 3 AEs (36 of 130 [27.7%]) v 82 of 162 [50.6%]; P < .001). The most common grade ≥ 3 AEs were ascites (five of 130 [3.8%] v four of 162 [2.5%] patients), abdominal pain (three [2.3%] v two [1.2%] patients), anemia (zero v four [2.5%] patients), and radiation hepatitis (two [1.5%] v zero [0%] patients). Fewer patients in the RE group (27 of 130 [20.8%]) than in the sorafenib group (57 of 162 [35.2%]) had serious AEs. Conclusion In patients with locally advanced HCC, OS did not differ significantly between RE and sorafenib. The improved toxicity profile of RE may inform treatment choice in selected patients.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI