缩颈
成形性
曲率
材料科学
表征(材料科学)
平面应力
成形极限图
数字图像相关
应变率
结构工程
复合材料
几何学
数学
有限元法
工程类
纳米技术
作者
Sante DiCecco,Kenneth Cheong,F. Khameneh,Zhi Deng,Michael J. Worswick,Cliff Butcher
出处
期刊:Metals
[Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute]
日期:2024-10-12
卷期号:14 (10): 1164-1164
被引量:3
摘要
Despite advancements in the characterization of forming limit curves (FLCs) with the development of stereoscopic digital image correlation (DIC), there is still uncertainty in the accuracy of the limit strains, especially in forming operations with out-of-plane bending. The ISO12004-2:2008 standard offers a standardized approach to FLC determination but is not without limitations and is not always applicable to new materials and forming processes (e.g., warm forming, hot stamping). In the present work, a physically based limit strain detection technique is developed, termed the Enhanced Curvature Method (ECM), based on the sheet surface curvature evolution at the onset of necking in sheet formability testing. The ECM is applied to the characterization of 1.1 mm AA5182-O sheet using Marciniak, Nakazima, and stretch–bend characterization tests, and its limit strains are compared with those from the linear best-fit (LBF) local strain-rate approach and the ISO-12004 standard. The ECM considers the physical nature of necking in sheet forming with the aid of thresholds defined in terms of an imperfection metric analogous to the well-known Marciniak–Kuczynski (MK) imperfection factor. By quantifying the evolution of necking, FLCs of different safety margins can be readily generated, enabling a more intuitive selection for the factor of safety. For lower and upper ECM thresholds, the Marciniak plane strain limiting strain was determined to lie between 0.173 and 0.198, respectively, which is comparable to the analytical prediction of 0.194 and in general agreement with the published literature for AA5182-O. Similar plane strain limits were obtained using the ISO and LBF methods with values of 0.188 and 0.208, respectively. The same rankings in limit strain values between methods were observed for plane strain loading in Nakazima and stretch–bend tests.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI