协变量
路径分析(统计学)
调解
事件(粒子物理)
计量经济学
临床试验
计算机科学
比例危险模型
基线(sea)
危害
论证(复杂分析)
生存分析
风险分析(工程)
数据挖掘
统计
医学
数学
机器学习
内科学
海洋学
量子力学
物理
地质学
有机化学
化学
法学
政治学
作者
Susanne Strohmaier,Kjetil Røysland,Rune Hoff,Ørnulf Borgan,Terje Pedersen,Odd O. Aalen
出处
期刊:Cornell University - arXiv
日期:2015-01-01
标识
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.1504.06506
摘要
When it comes to clinical survival trials, regulatory restrictions usually require the application of methods that solely utilize baseline covariates and the intention-to-treat principle. Thereby a lot of potentially useful information is lost, as collection of time-to-event data often goes hand in hand with collection of information on biomarkers and other internal time-dependent covariates. However, there are tools to incorporate information from repeated measurements in a useful manner that can help to shed more light on the underlying treatment mechanisms. We consider dynamic path analysis, a model for mediation analysis in the presence of a time-to-event outcome and time-dependent covariates to investigate direct and indirect effects in a study of different lipid lowering treatments in patients with previous myocardial infarctions. Further, we address the question whether survival in itself may produce associations between the treatment and the mediator in dynamic path analysis and give an argument that, due to linearity of the assumed additive hazard model, this is not the case. We further elaborate on our view that, when studying mediation, we are actually dealing with underlying processes rather than single variables measured only once during the study period. This becomes apparent in results from various models applied to the study of lipid lowering treatments as well as our additionally conducted simulation study, where we clearly observe, that discarding information on repeated measurements can lead to potentially erroneous conclusions.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI