医学
持续气道正压
胎龄
麻醉
气道
入射(几何)
鼻腔
外科
怀孕
遗传学
生物
光学
物理
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停
作者
E A Alsop,John P. Cooke,Samir Gupta,Sunil K. Sinha
摘要
Objective Nasal trauma is a recognised complication of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. There are different devices for CPAP delivery, but there are no data on the comparison of nasal injuries in controlled clinical trials. This prompted us to compare the incidence and severity of nasal injury on bubble CPAP and infant flow driver (IFD) CPAP. Methods Preterm infants Results Records were obtained on 85 infants (IFD 46, bubble CPAP 39). There was no difference in the gestational age (27.7 weeks in IFD vs 27.6 weeks in bubble CPAP) and birth weight (1046 g in IFD vs 1024 g in bubble CPAP) between two study groups. Half of the study infants sustained moderate (31.8%) or severe (24.7%) nasal injuries. This was similar in two groups (54.3% on IFD vs 59.0% on bubble CPAP; p = 0.668). The time of worst nasal injury was also similar in the two study groups (IFD 4.2 ± 3.9 days vs bubble CPAP 4.5 ± 5.1 days, p = 0.813). Conclusions Nasal trauma was a common occurrence in babies receiving CPAP treatment. The severity and time of worst nasal injury does not appear to be device related. Further intervention is required to reduce its frequency and severity.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI