透明质酸
鼻唇沟
填料(材料)
双盲
折叠(高阶函数)
随机对照试验
医学
内科学
外科
材料科学
复合材料
计算机科学
解剖
病理
替代医学
程序设计语言
安慰剂
作者
Bo Ri Kim,Jung Won Shin,Dae-Won Kim,Jai Jun Choung,You-Jin Jang,Seonghyeon Lee,Bo Seung Seo,Chang‐Hun Huh
标识
DOI:10.1097/prs.0000000000012320
摘要
Background: Nasolabial folds (NLFs) are a common cosmetic concern that makes people look older. Hyaluronic acid (HA)-based fillers are increasingly popular for minimally invasive facial wrinkle and fold correction. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new monophasic HA filler, CUREA ® , for NLF correction compared to the widely used Juvederm ® . Methods: A 24-week, prospective, single-center, double-blind, randomized, split-face, non-inferiority controlled trial was conducted. Seventy-four participants with moderate-to-severe NLFs were enrolled and treated with CUREA ® on one side of the face or Juvederm ® on the other. Evaluation included NLF improvement as determined using the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS), participant satisfaction, and adverse events. Results: At 24 weeks, CUREA ® significantly improved WSRS scores from 3.16 ± 0.84 at baseline to 2.59 ± 0.87 at week 24 ( P <0.001). CUREA ® demonstrated efficacy for NLF correction within the predefined non-inferiority margin compared to Juvederm ® . The safety profiles and participant satisfaction for CUREA ® were similar to those for Juvederm ® . Only mild, transient local reactions were observed, and participants were satisfied with the clinical improvement of both fillers throughout the 24-week follow up. Conclusions: CUREA ® is comparable to Juvederm ® in NLF correction and safety profiles, and its efficacy lasts up to 24 weeks.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI