Comparing the Value of Perceived Human versus AI-Generated Empathy

Artificial Intelligence (AI), and specifically large language models, demonstrate remarkable social-emotional abilities, which may improve human-AI interactions and AI’s emotional support capabilities. However, it remains unclear whether empathy, encompassing understanding, ’feeling with’, and caring, is perceived differently when attributed to AI versus humans. We conducted nine studies (N = 6,282) where AI-generated empathic responses to participants’ emotional situations were labeled as either provided by humans or AI. Human-attributed responses were rated as more empathic and supportive, and elicited more positive and fewer negative emotions, compared to AI-attributed ones. Moreover, participants own uninstructed belief that AI aided human-attributed responses, reduced perceived empathy and support. These effects replicated across varying response lengths, delays, iterations and LLMs, being primarily driven by responses emphasizing emotional sharing and care. Additionally, people consistently chose human interaction over AI when seeking emotional engagement. These findings advance our general understanding of empathy, and specifically human–AI empathic interactions.