医学
中止
伊马替尼
耐受性
内科学
髓系白血病
甲磺酸伊马替尼
不利影响
肿瘤科
危险系数
临床试验
随机对照试验
博舒替尼
酪氨酸激酶抑制剂
尼罗替尼
酪氨酸激酶
外科
临床研究阶段
白血病
存活率
疾病
作者
Jörge E. Cortes,Timothy P. Hughes,Jianxiang Wang,Dong Wook Kim,Dennis Dong Hwan Kim,Jiří Mayer,Yeow Tee Goh,Philipp le Coutre,Gabriel Étienne,In Ho Kim,David Andorsky,Felice Bombaci,Ghayas C. Issa,Naoto Takahashi,S. S. Kapoor,Rajendra Jinwal,Kamel Malek,Tracey McCulloch,Lillian Yau,Richard A. Larson
出处
期刊:Blood
[Elsevier BV]
日期:2025-12-15
卷期号:147 (13): 1433-1446
被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1182/blood.2025029210
摘要
ABSTRACT: Many patients receiving frontline tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) experience inadequate disease control and/or adverse events (AEs) that impair quality of life. Treatments offering optimal efficacy, safety, and tolerability will support long-term therapy. In the primary analysis from the ASC4FIRST trial, a phase 3 randomized trial comparing asciminib with investigator-selected TKIs (IS-TKIs) in newly diagnosed CML-CP, asciminib demonstrated superior efficacy vs all IS-TKIs and vs imatinib in the imatinib stratum, meeting both primary objectives. In the secondary analysis (2.2 years' median follow-up), major molecular response (MMR) rate at week 96 was 74.1% with asciminib vs 52.0% with IS-TKIs (treatment difference, 22.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 13.6-31.3]; 1-sided P< .001) and 76.2% with asciminib vs 47.1% with imatinib in the imatinib stratum (treatment difference, 29.7% [95% CI, 17.6-41.8]; 1-sided P< .001), meeting both key secondary objectives. MMR rate was 72.0% with asciminib vs 56.9% with second-generation (2G) TKIs (treatment difference, 15.1% [95% CI, 2.3-28.0]; 1-sided P< .05), suggesting possible clinical benefit, although the study was not designed to formally confirm statistical significance for this secondary end point. Safety/tolerability remained favorable with asciminib vs IS-TKIs. Dose reductions and interruptions, respectively, occurred with asciminib (18.5%; 46.5%), imatinib (23.2%; 47.5%), and 2G TKIs (54.9%; 63.7%). The hazard ratio for time to discontinuation of treatment due to AEs for asciminib vs 2G TKIs was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.215-0.997). With longer follow-up, asciminib continued to demonstrate a favorable benefit-risk profile over IS-TKIs and imatinib, supporting its potential as a treatment option for newly diagnosed CML-CP. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04971226.