计算机科学
运筹学
集合(抽象数据类型)
信息共享
控制(管理)
指挥与控制
独立性(概率论)
战场
时间范围
数学优化
分布式计算
实时计算
电信
人工智能
工程类
万维网
统计
古代史
程序设计语言
历史
数学
作者
Yan Xia,Rajan Batta,Rakesh Nagi
出处
期刊:Operations Research
[Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences]
日期:2017-04-11
卷期号:65 (3): 674-692
被引量:37
标识
DOI:10.1287/opre.2017.1590
摘要
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have been proved to be successful and efficient for information collection in a modern battlefield, especially in areas that are considered to be dangerous for human pilots. Currently, a UAV is remotely controlled by a ground station through frequent data communications, which make the current system vulnerable in a threat environment. We propose a decentralized control strategy while requiring UAVs to maintain radio silence during the entire mission. The strategy is analyzed based on a scenario where a fleet of vehicles is assigned to search and collect uncertain information in a set of regions within a given mission time. We demonstrate that a region-sharing strategy is beneficial even when there is no extra reward gained from additional information collection. Implementing a region-sharing strategy requires solving a decentralized time allocation problem, which is computationally intractable. To overcome this, an approximate formulation is developed under an independence assumption for information collected by different vehicles. This approximate formulation allows us to decompose, by vehicle, the time allocation problem, and obtain an easily implementable policy that takes on a Markovian form. We develop a sufficient condition under which the approximate formulation becomes exact. A numerical study establishes the computational efficiency of the method; only a few CPU seconds are needed for problems with a planning horizon of 300 time units and 40 regions. We further present a case study to illustrate region-sharing behaviors among UAVs while using practical parameter values. Finally, we compare the obtained policy with the optimal policy found using a complete enumeration method for small instances. Under different parameter settings, the average optimality gap ranges from 0.23% to 19.90%. The e-companion is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2017.1590 .
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI