Inferring synteny between genome assemblies: a systematic evaluation

Abstract Identification of synteny between genomes of closely related species is an important aspect of comparative genomics. However, it is unknown to what extent draft assemblies lead to errors in such analysis. To investigate this, we fragmented genome assemblies of model nematodes to various extents and conducted synteny identification and downstream analysis. We first show that synteny between species can be underestimated up to 40% and find disagreements between popular tools that infer synteny blocks. This inconsistency and further demonstration of erroneous gene ontology enrichment tests throws into question the robustness of previous synteny analysis when gold standard genome sequences remain limited. In addition, determining the true evolutionary relationship is compromised by assembly improvement using a reference guided approach with a closely related species. Annotation quality, however, has minimal effect on synteny if the assembled genome is highly contiguous. Our results highlight the need for gold standard genome assemblies for synteny identification and accurate downstream analysis. Author summary Genome assemblies across all domains of life are currently produced routinely. Initial analysis of any new genome usually includes annotation and comparative genomics. Synteny provides a framework in which conservation of homologous genes and gene order is identified between genomes of different species. The availability of human and mouse genomes paved the way for algorithm development in large-scale synteny mapping, which eventually became an integral part of comparative genomics. Synteny analysis is regularly performed on assembled sequences that are fragmented, neglecting the fact that most methods were developed using complete genomes. Here, we systematically evaluate this interplay by inferring synteny in genome assemblies with different degrees of contiguation. As expected, our investigation reveals that assembly quality can drastically affect synteny analysis, from the initial synteny identification to downstream analysis. Importantly, we found that improving a fragmented assembly using synteny with the genome of a related species can be dangerous, as this a priori assumes a potentially false evolutionary relationship between the species. The results presented here re-emphasize the importance of gold standard genomes to the science community, and should be achieved given the current progress in sequencing technology.