Time Dependence of Reliability of Noncontrast Computed Tomography in Comparison to Computed Tomography Angiography Source Image in Acute Ischemic Stroke

医学 冲程(发动机) 血管造影 计算机断层血管造影 放射科 计算机断层摄影术 颈内动脉 缺血性中风 可靠性(半导体) 队列 心脏病学 缺血 内科学 机械工程 功率(物理) 物理 量子力学 工程类
作者
Simerpreet Bal,Rohit Bhatia,Bijoy K Menon,Nandavar Shobha,Volker Puetz,Imanuel Dzialowski,Jayesh Modi,Mayank Goyal,Michael D. Hill,Eric E. Smith,Andrew M. Demchuk
出处
期刊:International Journal of Stroke [SAGE]
卷期号:10 (1): 55-60 被引量:83
标识
DOI:10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00859.x
摘要

There is no consensus on how the reliability and predictive ability of noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) and computed tomography angiography source image (CTASI) change over time from acute ischemic stroke onset. We hypothesized that the reliability for detecting early ischemic changes (EIC) would be lower in early time periods and that changes identified on CTASI would be more reliable across examiners than changes identified on NCCT. To address this, we compared the relationships between CTASI, NCCT, and final infarct in patients with initial computed tomography (CT) imaging at different time points after stroke onset. Patients with acute ischemic stroke with proximal anterior circulation occlusions (internal carotid artery, middle carotid artery M1, proximal M2) from Calgary CT Angiography (CTA) database were studied. The cohort was categorized in four groups based on time from stroke onset to baseline NCCT/CTA: 0–90 mins ( n = 69), 91–180 mins ( n = 88), 181–360 mins ( n = 46), and >360 mins ( n = 58). Median scores of NCCT-Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS), CTASI ASPECTS, and follow-up ASPECTS among different time categories were compared. To determine reliability, a subsample of NCCT brain and CTASI were interpreted at separate sessions weeks apart by two neuroradiologists and two stroke neurologists in random order. Median and mean ASPECTS ratings on NCCT and CTASI were higher than final ASPECTS in each time category ( P < 0·001 for all comparisons). CTASI ASPECTS was lower than NCCT ASPECTS in each time category, and differences were significant at 0–90 mins and 91–180 mins ( P < 0·001). The least agreement among readers was in detection of EIC on NCCT brain in the ultra-early phase (<90 mins) [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0·48. By contrast, there was excellent agreement on EIC on CTASI regardless of time period (ICC = 0·87–0·96). Using ASPECTS methodology, CTASI is more reliable than NCCT at predicting final infarct extent particularly in the early time windows.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
16完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
DrW发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
dd发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
yYy发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Ava应助dd采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
树叶应助酷炫梦蕊采纳,获得10
13秒前
沙111完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
Buuuke完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
在水一方应助nhsyb嘉采纳,获得10
21秒前
Shaangueuropa发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
小草发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
Aixia发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
旧梦如烟发布了新的文献求助30
26秒前
27秒前
Wency发布了新的文献求助50
32秒前
33秒前
yYy完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
兴奋巧凡完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
37秒前
37秒前
CodeCraft应助旧梦如烟采纳,获得10
37秒前
加菲丰丰应助小草采纳,获得10
40秒前
英姑应助小草采纳,获得10
40秒前
44秒前
小二郎应助兴奋巧凡采纳,获得10
45秒前
46秒前
wanci应助冷傲小猫咪采纳,获得10
49秒前
英姑应助郑zhenglanyou采纳,获得10
51秒前
54秒前
辣味尖尖酱完成签到 ,获得积分10
56秒前
nhsyb嘉完成签到,获得积分10
56秒前
59秒前
nhsyb嘉发布了新的文献求助10
59秒前
59秒前
情怀应助tuanheqi采纳,获得20
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
单薄茗发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
高分求助中
Teaching Social and Emotional Learning in Physical Education 900
Plesiosaur extinction cycles; events that mark the beginning, middle and end of the Cretaceous 800
Recherches Ethnographiques sue les Yao dans la Chine du Sud 500
Two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis reveals causal relationships between blood lipids and venous thromboembolism 500
Chinese-English Translation Lexicon Version 3.0 500
[Lambert-Eaton syndrome without calcium channel autoantibodies] 460
Wisdom, Gods and Literature Studies in Assyriology in Honour of W. G. Lambert 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2394005
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2097845
关于积分的说明 5286180
捐赠科研通 1825362
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 910154
版权声明 559943
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 486433