Uncovering the realities of delusional experience in schizophrenia: a qualitative phenomenological study in Belgium

心理学 解释现象学分析 妄想 经验抽样法 定性研究 苦恼 妄想障碍 体验式学习 患者体验 现象学(哲学) 真实性测试 临床心理学 精神科 心理治疗师 精神病 社会心理学 医疗保健 认知 社会科学 哲学 数学教育 认识论 社会学 经济 经济增长
作者
Jasper Feyaerts,Wouter Kusters,Zeno Van Duppen,Stijn Vanheule,Inez Myin‐Germeys,Louis A. Sass
出处
期刊:The Lancet Psychiatry [Elsevier]
卷期号:8 (9): 784-796 被引量:57
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2215-0366(21)00196-6
摘要

Background Delusions in schizophrenia are commonly approached as empirical false beliefs about everyday reality. Phenomenological accounts, by contrast, have suggested that delusions are more adequately understood as pertaining to a different kind of reality experience. How this alteration of reality experience should be characterised, which dimensions of experiential life are involved, and whether delusional reality might differ from standard reality in various ways is unclear and little is known about how patients with delusions value and relate to these experiential alterations. This study aimed to investigate the nature of delusional reality experience, and its subjective apprehension, in individuals with lived experience of delusions and a schizophrenia-spectrum diagnosis. Methods In this qualitative phenomenological study, we recruited individuals with lived experience of delusions and a schizophrenia-spectrum diagnosis from two psychiatric-hospital services in Belgium using homogenous sampling. Criteria for participation were having undergone at least one psychotic episode with occurring delusional symptoms, present at least 1 year before participation, on the basis of clinical notes assessed by the attending psychiatrist; a schizophrenia-spectrum diagnosis, ascertained through clinical interview by the attending psychiatrist upon admission; being aged between 18 years and 65 years; and having the capacity to give informed consent. Exclusion criteria included worries concerning capacity to consent and risk of distress caused by participation. We did phenomenologically driven semi-structured interviews with the participants to explore the nature of delusional reality experience and their subjective valuation of these experiences. We used interpretative phenomenological analysis, a qualitative method tailored to the in-depth exploration of participants' first-person perspective, to analyse their accounts. Findings Between March 2, 2020, and Sept 30, 2020, 18 adults (13 men and five women, aged 19–62 years) participated in the interview study. The findings suggest that delusions are often embedded in wide-ranging alterations of basic reality experience, involving quasi-ineffable atmospheric and ontological qualities that undermine participants' sense of the world as unambiguously real, fully present, and shared with others. We also found that delusional reality experience can differ from standard reality in various ways (ie, in a hypo-real and hyper-real form), across multiple dimensions (eg, meaningfulness, necessity and contingency, and detachment and engagement), and that participants are often implicitly or explicitly aware of the distinction between delusional and standard reality. Delusional experience can have an enduring value and meaning that is not fully captured by a strictly medical perspective. Interpretation Increased awareness and recognition of the distinctive nature of delusional reality experience, in both clinical and research settings, can improve diagnostic accuracy, explanatory models, and therapeutic support for individuals with delusions whose lived realities are not always evident from an everyday perspective. Funding FWO Flanders. Translation For the Dutch translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
风中小鸽子完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
极电发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
susong987完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
CC完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
sunshine完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
海人完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
不回首完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
香蕉飞瑶完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
满意紫丝发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
linlinlin完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
guanghan完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
三水完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
科研老兵完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
激昂的吐司完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
laville完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
faustss完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
明眸完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
Myownway完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
歪猴完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
科研通AI6.1应助常常采纳,获得10
8秒前
小魏哥完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
柚木发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
吃不完的玉米完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
干卿发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
singefly发布了新的文献求助30
9秒前
松松完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
Quiller.Wang完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
孔问筠完成签到,获得积分0
11秒前
applennad完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
科研通AI6.1应助含蓄觅山采纳,获得10
13秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Forensic and Legal Medicine Third Edition 5000
Introduction to strong mixing conditions volume 1-3 5000
Agyptische Geschichte der 21.30. Dynastie 3000
„Semitische Wissenschaften“? 1510
从k到英国情人 1500
Cummings Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 8th Edition 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5765363
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5560745
关于积分的说明 15408637
捐赠科研通 4900116
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2636197
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1584411
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1539665