Comparative Efficacy of Therapeutics for Chronic Cancer Pain: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

医学 安慰剂 内科学 普瑞巴林 随机对照试验 癌症疼痛 类阿片 慢性疼痛 优势比 可待因 阿司匹林 癌症 麻醉 物理疗法 吗啡 受体 替代医学 病理
作者
Rongzhong Huang,Lihong Jiang,Yu Cao,Hongli Liu,Minsheng Ping,Wei Li,Yü Xu,Jie Ning,Yuqing Chen,Xiaojing Wang
出处
期刊:Journal of Clinical Oncology [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:37 (20): 1742-1752 被引量:33
标识
DOI:10.1200/jco.18.01567
摘要

PURPOSE Opioids are the primary choice for managing chronic cancer pain. However, many nonopioid therapies are currently prescribed for chronic cancer pain with little published evidence comparing their efficacy. METHODS Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any systemic pharmaceutical intervention and/or combination thereof in treating chronic cancer pain. The primary outcome was global efficacy reported as an odds ratio (OR). The secondary outcome was change in pain intensity reported as a standardized mean difference (SMD). RESULTS We included 81 RCTs consisting of 10,003 patients investigating 11 medication classes. Most RCTs (80%) displayed low risk of bias. The top-ranking classes for global efficacy were nonopioid analgesics (network OR, 0.30; 95% credibility interval [CrI], 0.13 to 0.67), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (network OR, 0.44; 95% CrI, 0.22 to 0.90), and opioids (network OR, 0.49; 95% CrI, 0.27 to 0.86), whereas the top-ranked interventions were lidocaine (network OR, 0.04; 95% CrI, 0.01 to 0.18; surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis [SUCRA] score, 98.1), codeine plus aspirin (network OR, 0.22; 95% CrI, 0.08 to 0.63; SUCRA score, 81.1), and pregabalin (network OR, 0.29; 95% CrI, 0.08 to 0.92; SUCRA score, 73.8). In terms of reducing pain intensity, we found that no class was superior to placebo, whereas the following top-ranked interventions were superior to placebo: ziconotide (network SMD, −24.98; 95% CrI, −32.62 to −17.35; SUCRA score, 99.8), dezocine (network SMD, −13.56; 95% CrI, −23.37 to −3.69; SUCRA score, 93.5), and diclofenac (network SMD, −11.22; 95% CrI, −15.91 to −5.80; SUCRA score, 92.9). CONCLUSION There are significant differences in efficacy among current regimens for chronic cancer pain. Our evidence suggests that certain nonopioid analgesics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can serve as effectively as opioids in managing chronic cancer pain.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
闪闪完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
Akim应助taohehe采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
小提子发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
Jasper应助dd采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
喜欢小怿发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
科研通AI6.2应助11采纳,获得10
3秒前
科研通AI6.1应助LAN采纳,获得30
3秒前
marg发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
无极微光应助小星星采纳,获得20
4秒前
xiao完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
一颗红葡萄完成签到 ,获得积分0
5秒前
闪闪发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
优雅的士萧完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
大胆瑛完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
嗯嗯完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Aceawei完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
孑然发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
Orange应助ZZY采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
不将夏发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
在水一方应助Sampson采纳,获得100
8秒前
NIKOL发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
LEGEND完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
木兮发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
慕青应助xiaotiyang采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
萧雅发布了新的文献求助20
10秒前
10秒前
爆米花应助小鲤鱼在睡觉采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
辛儿的毅发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
高分求助中
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 1234
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Petrology and Plate Tectonics,2025 400
Burger's Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery 400
New directions for experimental lessons in science teaching: Myth, Mystery, Necessity? by Emily K. da Silva Cunha Souto (Author), Flávia Lins Silva (Author) 333
Scientific experimentation in the classroom: Comparison between genetic-Socratic-exemplary teaching and workshop teaching by Ingrid Hofer (Author) 333
Programming for Chemical Engineers Using C, C++, and MATLAB 320
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6721628
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8458019
关于积分的说明 18057180
捐赠科研通 5974114
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2996445
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1972483
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1926453