Comparative Efficacy of Therapeutics for Chronic Cancer Pain: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

医学 安慰剂 内科学 普瑞巴林 随机对照试验 癌症疼痛 类阿片 慢性疼痛 优势比 可待因 阿司匹林 癌症 麻醉 物理疗法 吗啡 受体 替代医学 病理
作者
Rongzhong Huang,Lihong Jiang,Yu Cao,Hongli Liu,Minsheng Ping,Wei Li,Yü Xu,Jie Ning,Yuqing Chen,Xiaojing Wang
出处
期刊:Journal of Clinical Oncology [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:37 (20): 1742-1752 被引量:36
标识
DOI:10.1200/jco.18.01567
摘要

PURPOSE: Opioids are the primary choice for managing chronic cancer pain. However, many nonopioid therapies are currently prescribed for chronic cancer pain with little published evidence comparing their efficacy. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any systemic pharmaceutical intervention and/or combination thereof in treating chronic cancer pain. The primary outcome was global efficacy reported as an odds ratio (OR). The secondary outcome was change in pain intensity reported as a standardized mean difference (SMD). RESULTS: We included 81 RCTs consisting of 10,003 patients investigating 11 medication classes. Most RCTs (80%) displayed low risk of bias. The top-ranking classes for global efficacy were nonopioid analgesics (network OR, 0.30; 95% credibility interval [CrI], 0.13 to 0.67), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (network OR, 0.44; 95% CrI, 0.22 to 0.90), and opioids (network OR, 0.49; 95% CrI, 0.27 to 0.86), whereas the top-ranked interventions were lidocaine (network OR, 0.04; 95% CrI, 0.01 to 0.18; surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis [SUCRA] score, 98.1), codeine plus aspirin (network OR, 0.22; 95% CrI, 0.08 to 0.63; SUCRA score, 81.1), and pregabalin (network OR, 0.29; 95% CrI, 0.08 to 0.92; SUCRA score, 73.8). In terms of reducing pain intensity, we found that no class was superior to placebo, whereas the following top-ranked interventions were superior to placebo: ziconotide (network SMD, -24.98; 95% CrI, -32.62 to -17.35; SUCRA score, 99.8), dezocine (network SMD, -13.56; 95% CrI, -23.37 to -3.69; SUCRA score, 93.5), and diclofenac (network SMD, -11.22; 95% CrI, -15.91 to -5.80; SUCRA score, 92.9). CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in efficacy among current regimens for chronic cancer pain. Our evidence suggests that certain nonopioid analgesics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can serve as effectively as opioids in managing chronic cancer pain.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
ke发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
林笑笑发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
wangli发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
871004188发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
彪yu完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Jason完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
light完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
深情安青的应助被keyi采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
JeffYe完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
聪慧念柏发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
jsq发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
詹詹完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Aja Wu发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
沉醉的中国钵完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
wwwy完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
王加利完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
今后的应助被汉堡宝采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
FelixZhou发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
TTTZH完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
jiang发布了新的文献求助20
7秒前
小额发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
xth完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
冷静的嫣然完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
SciGPT的应助被冷酷严青采纳,获得10
8秒前
xixi完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
情怀的应助被AXXXin采纳,获得30
8秒前
SherlockJia的应助被林笑笑采纳,获得10
8秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Energie-Contracting 1500
Klimaschutzrecht durch den Energiesektor im Mehrebenensystem – Ein Rechtsvergleich 1000
Stochastic Models in Operations Research,Vol. 2 600
Critical Bildung: Hegel and the Logic of Diremption 500
桑白皮エキスの実験的, 臨床的育毛効果について 500
Qualitative Methodologies in Tourism Studies: Disrupting and Co-creating Critical Research 350
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8036953
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9472675
关于积分的说明 21261370
捐赠科研通 7606446
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3390256
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2522090
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2427549