A comparative study on effectiveness of constraint induced movement therapy Versus conventional therapy in improving upper limb functional on patients with stroke.
INTRODUCTION :
Constraint induece movement therapy is a rehabitation approach
that is designed to reduce in capitating motor deficits of the upper limbs
in patient after neurological injury and increase their functional
independence. Conventional Therapy (CT) is a usual and customary care on
improve the upper extremity function.
AIM : The study is to find out whether there is any significant
difference between constraint induced movement therapy versus
conventional therapy in improving upper limb function on patients with stroke.
METHODS : The study was experimental in nature. Twenty samples were
selected using simple random sampling method and divided into two
equal groups. 1. Experimental group – I, 2. Experimental group - II
Pretest measurements of upper limb function were taken for both
The groups using Fug1 – meyer scale. After the pretest, the experimental group – I received conventional
therapy whereas experimental group II received constraint induced movement therapy for a period of 8 weeks.
Post – test measurement where taken for both the experimental
groups in a similar fashion as that of pretest assessment at the end of 8 weeks.
RESULTS :
The data was subjected to statistical analysis and the following
results were obtained.
Conventional therapy is significantly effective in improving upper
limb function on patients with stroke.
Constraint induced movement therapy is significantly effective in
improving upper limb function on patients with stroke.
Constraint induced movement therapy is significantly effective in
improving upper limb function on patients with stroke.
Constraint induced movement therapy is significantly effective in
improving upper limb function than conventional therapy on patients with
stroke.
CONCLUSION ;
The results of this study make us conclude that constraint include
movement therapy is significantly effective in improving upper limb
function than conventional therapy on patients with stroke.