Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of interventions for depressive symptoms in patients with coronary artery disease

医学 随机对照试验 荟萃分析 冠状动脉疾病 萧条(经济学) 安慰剂 心理干预 系统回顾 内科学 物理疗法 梅德林 精神科 替代医学 经济 法学 政治学 宏观经济学 病理
作者
Frank Doyle,KE Freedland,RM Carney,Peter de Jonge,Chris Dickens,Sindre Andre Pedersen,Jan Sørensen,Martin Dempster
出处
期刊:European Journal of Preventive Cardiology [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:28 (Supplement_1)
标识
DOI:10.1093/eurjpc/zwab061.184
摘要

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Objective Depression is common in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and is associated with poor outcomes. Although different treatments are available, it is unclear which are best or most acceptable to patients, so we conducted a network meta-analysis of evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of different depression treatments to ascertain relative efficacy. Methods We searched for systematic reviews of RCTs of depression treatments in CAD and updated these with a comprehensive search for recent individual RCTs. RCTs comparing depression treatments (pharmacological, psychotherapeutic, combined pharmacological/psychotherapeutic, exercise, collaborative care) were included. Primary outcomes were acceptability (dropout rate) and change in depressive symptoms 8-weeks post-treatment commencement. Change in 26-week depression and mortality were secondary outcomes. Frequentist, random effects network meta-analysis synthesized the evidence. GRADE was used to assess evidence quality. Results Thirty-three RCTs (7240 participants) provided analysable data. All treatments were equally acceptable. At 8-weeks, combination therapy (1 study), exercise (1 study), and antidepressants (10 studies) yielded the strongest effects versus comparators. At 26-weeks, antidepressants were consistently effective, but psychotherapy was only effective versus usual care. There were no differences in treatment groups for mortality. GRADE ratings ranged from very low to low. Conclusions All treatments were equally acceptable, while antidepressants appeared to have the most robust evidence base for post-CAD depression. The evidence base was limited and biased; conclusions based on this literature should be drawn cautiously and considered to be tentative. Rigorous, multi-arm intervention trials, including trials of combination therapies and exercise, are urgently needed.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
fffan完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
zybbb完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
ooo发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
连敏锐发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
Ted发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
yls发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Lucas应助那年autumn采纳,获得10
3秒前
迷人依白完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
Hello应助饼饼采纳,获得50
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
共享精神应助农民饭采纳,获得10
5秒前
饱满服饰发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
复杂云朵完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
JamesPei应助年轻的安白采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
OK应助Chu_JH采纳,获得200
6秒前
xuanxuan完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
水123发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
Mok完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
活泼的明轩完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
秋丶凡尘发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
塔吉普雷克矛盾体完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
JEEH完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
刘慧鑫发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
曲奇发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
ooo完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Tanning Chemistry: The Science of Leather (2nd Edition) 2000
Development of a Bridge Weigh-In-Motion System: A technology to convert the bridge response to the passage of traffic into data on vehicle configurations, speeds, times of travel and weights 1000
Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis, 4th Edition 1000
Organic Reactions, Volume 116 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7260165
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8882072
关于积分的说明 18768402
捐赠科研通 6940172
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3201751
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2375481
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2177542