医学
心脏病学
植入式心律转复除颤器
心室颤动
内科学
心源性休克
心脏停搏
心房颤动
无症状的
室性心动过速
心肌病
心力衰竭
麻醉
心肌梗塞
作者
Kirtivardhan Vashistha,Akshat Banga,Michael Nestasie,Sarumathi Thangavel,Mian Tanveer Ud Din,George Shaw
标识
DOI:10.2174/011573403x344795250304084151
摘要
Background: The misdiagnosis of seizure disorders in patients with cardiogenic syncope and tachy-bradyarrhythmias is a significant diagnostic challenge as the differentials for altered mental status and syncope are broad and can mimic other clinical conditions. This case report presents a unique case of an elderly male with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia, initially misdiagnosed as a seizure disorder associated with syncope and treated with anti-epileptics for a neurogenic cause, before an ambulatory cardiac monitor revealed a sinister cardiogenic etiology. Case Presentation: An 87-year-old man with ischemic cardiomyopathy (LVEF 20%) and persistent atrial fibrillation presented for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) evaluation following a ventricular fibrillation (VF) arrest. He had a history of recurrent syncope accompanied by muscle jerking and was initially treated with anti-epileptic drugs. However, further evaluation with mobile telemetry revealed ventricular arrhythmias, including nonsustained VT, VF, and asystole. Anti-epileptic medications were discontinued, and the patient was started on amiodarone. A cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) was implanted, which successfully resolved his symptoms. Post-treatment, he remained asymptomatic, with no new VT/VF episodes detected at one week and three months during follow-up device checks. Conclusion: This case underscores the importance of considering cardiogenic causes in patients with syncope and seizure-like symptoms. Therefore, a multidisciplinary approach is essential for accurate diagnosis and management.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI