医学
抗血栓
重症监护医学
背景(考古学)
纤溶剂
抗凝剂
药品
抗血小板药物
外科
药理学
内科学
阿司匹林
氯吡格雷
生物
古生物学
作者
Davide Cao,Nicolas Amabile,Mauro Chiarito,Victoria T. Lee,Dominick J. Angiolillo,Davide Capodanno,Deepak L. Bhatt,Michael J. Mack,Robert F. Storey,Michael Schmoeckel,C. Michael Gibson,Efthymios Deliargyris,Roxana Mehran
标识
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad119
摘要
Remarkable progress has been made in the pharmacological management of patients with cardiovascular disease, including the frequent use of antithrombotic agents. Nonetheless, bleeding complications remain frequent and potentially life-threatening. Therapeutic interventions relying on prompt antithrombotic drug reversal or removal have been developed to assist clinicians in treating patients with active bleeding or an imminent threat of major bleeding due to urgent surgery or invasive procedures. Early phase studies on these novel strategies have shown promising results using surrogate pharmacodynamic endpoints. However, the benefit of reversing/removing antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs should always be weighed against the possible prothrombotic effects associated with withdrawal of antithrombotic protection, bleeding, and surgical trauma. Understanding the ischemic-bleeding risk tradeoff of antithrombotic drug reversal and removal strategies in the context of urgent high-risk settings requires dedicated clinical investigations, but challenges in trial design remain, with relevant practical, financial, and ethical implications.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI