生物标志物
队列
医学
疾病
肿瘤科
脑脊液
内科学
α-突触核蛋白
接收机工作特性
队列研究
正电子发射断层摄影术
帕金森病
生物标志物发现
神经退行性变
突触核蛋白
病理
路易体
血浆水平
曲线下面积
诊断准确性
诊断生物标志物
生物信息学
阿尔茨海默病
前瞻性队列研究
内分泌学
神经科学
退行性疾病
作者
Alena Smith,Sara A. Lorkiewicz,Burak Arslan,Laia Montoliu‐Gaya,Nicholas J. Ashton,Edward N. Wilson,Daniel Alcolea,Íñigo Rodríguez‐Baz,Juan Fortea,Christina B. Young,Joseph R. Winer,Marian Shahid,Hillary Vossler,Melanie J. Plastini,Tao Pan,Elena Vera-Campuzano,Isabel Sala,Jaime Mendiola,Veronica Ramirez,Geoffrey A. Kerchner
标识
DOI:10.1101/2025.09.07.25335217
摘要
Abstract Background Multiple proteinopathies commonly coexist in neurodegenerative diseases, therefore it is critical to understand plasma biomarker performance to detect proteinopathies in these complex diseases. While plasma biomarkers can accurately detect amyloid-β in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease, their performance accuracy is unknown in individuals with Neuronal Synuclein Disease (NSD). Objective To determine the accuracy of plasma pTau217, pTau181, Aβ42/40, GFAP, and NfL to detect amyloid-β in NSD. Additionally, to establish and validate cut-points for the most promising amyloid-β plasma biomarker in NSD. Methods This cross-sectional cohort study analyzed data from two observational cohorts from Stanford University and Sant Pau Hospital. The discovery cohort participants were biologically-defined by NSD and Aβ status among clinical Lewy body disease (LBD), Alzheimer’s disease (AD), or cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals. The two validation cohorts consisted of clinically-defined LBD participants. Data were analyzed from 2/2024-3/2025. Plasma pTau217, pTau181, Aβ42/40, GFAP, and NfL were analyzed as potential biomarkers for amyloid-β in NSD, using cerebrospinal fluid Aβ42/40 and Aβ positron emission tomography as reference gold-standards. Diagnostic accuracy was determined using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results We included 253 participants (mean[SD] age=71[9.9] years), 180 from the discovery cohort and 73 from the clinical validation cohorts. In the discovery cohort, plasma pTau217, pTau181, Aβ42/40, and GFAP levels significantly differed between Aβ+ and Aβ-participants, regardless of NSD status. Plasma NfL levels were significantly higher in the NSD+/Aβ+ group compared to all other groups. Plasma pTau217 showed the largest median fold-change between Aβ+ and Aβ-participants and demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance in detecting amyloid-β in NSD (Area Under the Curve=0.92, 95% CI=0.81-0.98). Applying one-or two-reference cut points for plasma pTau217 in the validation cohorts could reduce the need for additional amyloid-β testing in 41-56% of clinically-defined LBD participants. Conclusions Plasma pTau217 accurately detects amyloid-β in NSD individuals, with reproducible cut points in clinical LBD cohorts. Our findings demonstrate plasma pTau217 is a cost-effective and minimally-invasive tool for determining amyloid-β in mixed-etiology neurodegenerative diseases of aging.