Newsroom Engineering Teams as “Survival Entities” for Journalism? Mapping the Process of Institutionalization at The Washington Post

制度化 透明度(行为) 自治 过程(计算) 公共关系 社会学 政治学 计算机科学 法学 操作系统
作者
Hannes Cools,Baldwin Van Gorp,Michaël Opgenhaffen
出处
期刊:Digital journalism [Taylor & Francis]
卷期号:12 (2): 171-190
标识
DOI:10.1080/21670811.2023.2195115
摘要

AbstractAbstractEngineering teams – a form of newsroom innovation labs – have been heralded as survival entities in the news ecosystem as they have the potential to improve where news goes and moves. At The Washington Post, these teams have been around for three years, and they started to implement tools like election models fueled by A.I. and smart data pipelines that can possibly affect the autonomy and the tasks of the broader newsroom. By applying the process of institutionalization as an analytical framework, this study enhances our understanding of how the interaction takes place between these rather novel engineering teams and the established newsroom. In addition, we get a glimpse if the tools that are being implemented by these engineering teams are taken for granted and what forms of interaction obstruct or drive the way these tools are institutionalized. This study conducted 16 expert interviews focusing on the interaction and the process of institutionalization in combination with digital ethnography where that interaction is observable. Results reveal how the innovation justify – via interaction – the implementation of these tools to the broader newsroom and vice versa. The ways in which the tools are trusted to a minimal group of the newsroom show that the process of institutionalization, for both the teams and the tools, are still in a nascent state. The journalists in the broader newsroom that trust these tools are mostly data savvy and are therefore very homogenous. Transparency is key in order to increase institutionalization across the newsroom for these engineering teams and their tools.Keywords: Case studyinnovation labsinstitutional theorymedia labsnewsroom innovation AcknowledgementsWe would like to thank the reviewers for the useful comments that helped us improve the manuscript.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
然然然发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Ly完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
在水一方应助Fighting采纳,获得150
3秒前
ccc发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
做好自己发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
叫我饱饱就好了完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
科研通AI2S应助mcrui采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
able完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
linkun完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
听风完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
多多指教完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
雪白紫夏发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
linkun发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
Chase完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
默默毛豆完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
豪豪完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
key完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
qqqq_8完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
Brave发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
orixero应助anting采纳,获得10
18秒前
Fighting发布了新的文献求助150
18秒前
zhaolee发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
WUYISONG完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
22秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助ray采纳,获得10
23秒前
长情的向真完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
忽远忽近的她完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
dde应助陈晓迪1992采纳,获得10
25秒前
73Jennie123完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
端庄千山完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
长安宁发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
花痴的电灯泡完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
兴奋小丸子完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
多肉丸子完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
LEMON完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
32秒前
雪白紫夏完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
高分求助中
Psychopathic Traits and Quality of Prison Life 1000
Chemistry and Physics of Carbon Volume 18 800
The formation of Australian attitudes towards China, 1918-1941 660
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
天津市智库成果选编 600
Forced degradation and stability indicating LC method for Letrozole: A stress testing guide 500
全相对论原子结构与含时波包动力学的理论研究--清华大学 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6451350
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8263270
关于积分的说明 17607007
捐赠科研通 5516127
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2903669
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1880634
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1722651