研究领域标准
精神病理学
心理动力学
心理学
分类学(生物学)
心理治疗师
工程伦理学
精神科
生物
植物
工程类
作者
Awais Aftab,Konrad Banicki,Mark L. Ruffalo,Allen Frances
标识
DOI:10.1097/nmd.0000000000001791
摘要
Abstract The controversies surrounding the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and International Classification of Diseases have generated significant debate across the psy-sciences. This debate has been further fueled by the launch of the Research Domain Criteria as a framework to facilitate advances in neuroscientific research, a renewed emphasis on dimensional models of psychopathology, currently exemplified by the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology, and development of the Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual by the psychodynamic community. In this article, we provide a clinical overview of recent debates surrounding categorical and dimensional approaches to psychiatric diagnosis, offer a critical assessment of proposed alternatives, and discuss how clinicians can navigate a plurality of diagnostic frameworks. Our discussion emphasizes that diagnostic frameworks need to be contextualized within the process of a comprehensive clinical evaluation, and their advantages and disadvantages should be understood in relationship to the theoretical orientations and practical needs of clinicians.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI