Use of Routine Bloodwork on General Internal Medicine Inpatients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

医学 回顾性队列研究 重症监护室 急诊医学 队列 人口 输血 队列研究 贫血 内科学 环境卫生
作者
William K. Silverstein,Adina Weinerman,Rick Wang,Lisa K. Hicks,R. Sacha Bhatia,Wendy Levinson,Fahad Razak,Amol A. Verma
出处
期刊:Blood [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:134 (Supplement_1): 56-56 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1182/blood-2019-124219
摘要

Introduction Choosing Wisely (CW) recommendations in Canada and the United States advise against routine blood work on stable inpatients because it is unlikely to improve patient care, is associated with anemia and pain, and increases costs. While numerous local quality improvement initiatives have effectively reduced the use of routine blood work (RBW), no population-level analyses have assessed the use of RBW on hospitalized patients in the CW era. This study aimed to describe the use of RBW between 2010 and 2017 by physicians caring for General Internal Medicine (GIM) inpatients at 7 hospitals. We hypothesized that RBW use would decrease over time and that increased use of RBW would be associated with greater reductions in hemoglobin. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study using the General Medicine Inpatient Initiative (GEMINI) database, based in Ontario, Canada. The GEMINI database contains clinical and administrative data for all patients admitted to a GIM service at seven hospitals (5 academic centres; 2 community hospitals) in Toronto and Mississauga. We included all patients included in the GEMINI database, admitted from April 1, 2010 (prior to CW Canada), to March 31, 2017 (3 years after CW Canada's launch). Patients were excluded if they were admitted with a bleeding diagnosis, underwent an endoscopic or surgical procedure, were admitted to an Intensive Care Unit, or were admitted to hospital for less than 72 hours or greater than 30 days. Patients that received a blood transfusion during the first 48 hours of admission, or did not have hemoglobin measured within their first 48 hours of admission were also excluded. Physicians were excluded if they were the most responsible physician (MRP) for fewer than 100 admissions. Our primary outcome was the mean volume of RBW ordered per patient per day by the MRP. RBW was defined as complete blood count, electrolytes, extended electrolytes, creatinine, liver panel, INR, or PTT. To examine changes in the distribution of RBW ordering over time, we report RBW use at the following physician percentiles: 10, 25, 50, 75, 90. Prior analyses of the relationship between RBW use and reduction in Hgb in hospital are confounded (sicker patients receive more bloodwork). To avoid this confounding, we examined change in Hgb among patients of physicians stratified by RBW use. Patients are quasirandomly allocated to physicians in GIM, and thus, observed differences can be attributed to physician practice, not patient factors. We report the mean change in Hgb as a continuous outcome, and also percentage of patients who experienced a clinically significant reduction in Hgb, which was prespecified as at least 10 g/L. Statistical significance was determined using Chi-square tests for categorical variables, and Kruskall-Wallis tests for continuous variables. Results We included 65,507 hospital admissions. The mean volume of RBW ordered per patient per day significantly decreased from 2010 to 2016, for all percentiles (p<0.001 for all percentiles; as an example: 7.23cc in 2010 to 6.17cc in 2016 for patients admitted to physicians in the 25-50th percentile) (Figure 1). The mean volume of RBW ordered per patient per day significantly decreased from 2010 to 2016 in all but one hospital (Figure 2). However, the spread between the 10th and 90th percentile physicians did not change much between 2010 (1.77cc/patient/day) and 2016 (1.84 cc/patient/day). There was a dose-response relationship between MRP use of RBW and reductions in patient Hgb (Table 1). Compared to patients of MRPs in the lowest 10% of RBW use, patients of physicians in the highest 10% had a greater mean reduction in Hgb (4.93 g/L vs 3.34 g/L, p<0.001), and were more likely to have a clinically significant reduction in Hgb (23.1% vs. 18.7%, p<0.001). Conclusion This large, multi-centre cohort study demonstrated that greater use of RBW on GIM inpatients was associated with clinically significant reductions in Hgb. To our knowledge, this is the first study to rigorously demonstrate that greater use of RBW may be associated with clinically meaningful reductions in Hgb, independent of patient-level confounding. We further found that RBW use decreased overall with time, and in 6 out of 7 hospitals, between 2010 and 2017. However, the spread between 10th and 90th percentile physicians has not changed, suggesting that opportunities still exist to reduce RBW use at both the hospital and physician level. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
金金金鑫完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
铁甲小宝完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
5秒前
HYTingh完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
lucky发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
可爱的函函应助coryyyy采纳,获得10
6秒前
明亮鸣凤完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
坦率尔琴发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
WANG完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
FashionBoy应助肖未央采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
HYTingh发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
王开放发布了新的文献求助30
11秒前
天天快乐应助ZetaGundam采纳,获得10
11秒前
香蕉觅云应助坚强抽屉采纳,获得10
11秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助梅子黄时雨采纳,获得10
12秒前
隐形曼青应助王小帅采纳,获得10
12秒前
yxl发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
15秒前
15秒前
沣祾完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
fzx完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
司徒诗蕾完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
T_T完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
scycx完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
20秒前
张张发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
21秒前
22秒前
22秒前
打打应助biochen采纳,获得10
23秒前
wyz发布了新的文献求助200
23秒前
24秒前
25秒前
25秒前
Xi_Ling应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
汉堡包应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
26秒前
26秒前
CodeCraft应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
26秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Cardiovascular Research and Medicine(2e) 820
自動車の空力技術 800
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7781791
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9321380
关于积分的说明 20382762
捐赠科研通 7369589
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3320111
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2467955
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2336034