奖学金
启发式
问责
过程(计算)
工程伦理学
工作(物理)
心理学
公共关系
社会学
计算机科学
政治学
法学
机械工程
操作系统
工程类
人工智能
出处
期刊:Academic Medicine
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2016-07-04
卷期号:92 (2): 143-146
被引量:44
标识
DOI:10.1097/acm.0000000000001285
摘要
Collaborative writing in academic medicine gives rise to more richly informed scholarship, and yet challenging ethical issues surrounding authorship are commonly encountered. International guidelines on authorship help clarify whether individuals who have contributed to a completed scholarly work have been correctly included as authors, but these guidelines do not facilitate intentional and proactive authorship planning or decisions regarding authorship order. In this Commentary, the author presents a heuristic approach to help collaborators clarify, anticipate, and resolve practical and ethically important authorship issues as they engage in the process of developing manuscripts. As this approach illustrates, assignment of authorship should balance work effort and professional responsibility, reflecting the effort and intellectual contribution and the public accountability of the individuals who participate in the work. Using a heuristic approach for managing authorship issues prospectively can foster an ethical, collaborative writing process in which individuals are properly recognized for their contributions.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI