盒内非相干运动
磁共振弥散成像
医学
有效扩散系数
核医学
灌注
认知功能衰退
磁共振成像
邦费罗尼校正
内科学
放射科
数学
统计
疾病
痴呆
作者
Maurizio Bergamino,Anna Burke,Leslie C. Baxter,Richard J. Caselli,Marwan N. Sabbagh,Joshua S. Talboom,Matthew J. Huentelman,Ashley M. Stokes
摘要
Background Advanced diffusion‐based MRI biomarkers may provide insight into microstructural and perfusion changes associated with neurodegeneration and cognitive decline. Purpose To assess longitudinal microstructural and perfusion changes using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion‐weighted imaging (IVIM‐DWI) parameters in cognitively impaired (CI) and healthy control (HC) groups. Study Type Prospective/longitudinal. Population Twelve CI patients (75% female) and 13 HC subjects (69% female). Field Strength/Sequence 3 T; Spin‐Echo‐IVIM‐DWI. Assessment Two MRI scans were performed with a 12‐month interval. ADC and IVIM‐DWI metrics (diffusion coefficient [ D ] and perfusion fraction [ f ]) were generated from monoexponential and biexponential fits, respectively. Additionally, voxel‐based correlations were evaluated between change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (ΔMoCA) and baseline imaging parameters. Statistical Tests Analysis of covariance with sex and age as covariates was performed for main effects of group and time (false discovery rate [FDR] corrected) with post hoc comparisons using Bonferroni correction. Partial‐ η 2 and Hedges' g were used for effect‐size analysis. Spearman's correlations (FDR corrected) were used for the relationship between ΔMoCA score and imaging. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Significant differences were found for the main effects of group (HC vs. CI) and time. For group effects, higher ADC, IVIM‐ D , and IVIM‐ f were observed in the CI group compared to HC (ADC: 1.23 ± 0.08 . 10 −3 vs. 1.09 ± 0.07 . 10 −3 mm 2 /sec; IVIM‐D: 0.82 ± 0.01 . 10 −3 vs. 0.73 ± 0.01 . 10 −3 mm 2 /sec; and IVIM‐ f : 0.317 ± 0.008 vs. 0.253 ± 0.009). Significantly higher ADC, IVIM‐ D , and IVIM‐ f values were observed in the CI group after 12 months (ADC: 1.45 ± 0.05 . 10 −3 vs. 1.50 ± 0.07 . 10 −3 mm 2 /sec; IVIM‐ D : 0.87 ± 0.01 . 10 −3 vs. 0.94 ± 0.02 . 10 −3 mm 2 /sec; and IVIM‐ f : 0.303 ± 0.007 vs. 0.332 ± 0.008), but not in the HC group at large effect size. ADC, IVIM‐ D , and IVIM‐ f negatively correlated with ΔMoCA score ( ρ = −0.49, −0.51, and −0.50, respectively). Data Conclusion These findings demonstrate that longitudinal differences between CI and HC cohorts can be measured using IVIM‐based metrics. Level of Evidence 2 Technical Efficacy Stage 2
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI