An international study to assess reliability of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score

偏头痛 医学 可靠性(半导体) 物理疗法 人口 考试(生物学) 内部一致性 组内相关 电话采访 克朗巴赫阿尔法 人口学 临床心理学 心理测量学 精神科 环境卫生 物理 功率(物理) 古生物学 社会学 生物 量子力学 社会科学
作者
Walter F. Stewart,Richard B. Lipton,J. Whyte,Andrew J. Dowson,K. Kolodner,Joshua N. Liberman,Jason E. Sawyer
出处
期刊:Neurology [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:53 (5): 988-988 被引量:491
标识
DOI:10.1212/wnl.53.5.988
摘要

The Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) instrument is a five-item questionnaire developed to measure headache-related disability and improve doctor-patient communication about the functional consequences of migraine.To examine the test-retest reliability and internal consistency of the five items and of the overall MIDAS score in population-based samples of migraine sufferers in two countries and to compare consistency across countries.Using a clinically validated telephone interview, population-based samples of migraine-headache sufferers were identified in the United States (Baltimore, MD) and the United Kingdom (Merton and Sutton, Surrey). Eligible individuals completed the MIDAS questionnaire on two occasions an average of 3 weeks apart. The MIDAS score is derived from five questions about missed time from work and household work (one question each about missed days and days with at least 50% reduced productivity) and missed days of nonwork activities.A total of 97 migraine-headache sufferers from the United States and 100 from the United Kingdom completed the MIDAS questionnaire twice. Mean and median item values and overall MIDAS scores were similar between the United States and the United Kingdom. Test-retest Spearman correlations of individual items ranged from 0.46 to 0.78. No significant differences in item-specific correlations were observed between the United States and United Kingdom. The test-retest Pearson correlation of the MIDAS score (i.e., sum of lost days and reduced-effectiveness days in each domain) was 0.80 in the United States and 0.83 in the United Kingdom. The Cronbach alpha, a measure of internal consistency, was 0.76 in the United States and 0.73 in the United Kingdom.This is the first international population-based study to assess the reliability of a disability-related illness severity score for migraine. The reliability and internal consistency of the Migraine Disability Assessment score are similar to that of a previous questionnaire (Headache Impact Questionnaire). However, the Migraine Disability Assessment score requires fewer questions, is easier to score, and provides intuitively meaningful information on lost days of activity in three domains.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
yg完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
虫哥哥!发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
lym完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
大猪发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
昌子骞完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
陈奈何完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
天天快乐应助一一一采纳,获得30
11秒前
13秒前
韦老虎发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
kunzhao发布了新的文献求助20
14秒前
文静的凡儿完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
gjww应助天天采纳,获得10
16秒前
ns123发布了新的文献求助30
18秒前
细腻夏山完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
不爱读文献完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
jiejie发布了新的文献求助30
22秒前
30秒前
max完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
32秒前
33秒前
Maestro_S应助ns123采纳,获得10
33秒前
max发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
35秒前
共享精神应助zino采纳,获得10
35秒前
搜集达人应助xjl采纳,获得10
37秒前
38秒前
若水应助klchen采纳,获得10
38秒前
39秒前
40秒前
jiejie完成签到,获得积分20
40秒前
qiulin发布了新的文献求助10
41秒前
character577发布了新的文献求助10
41秒前
ChuChiHsu完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
直率三问完成签到,获得积分10
44秒前
45秒前
45秒前
一一一发布了新的文献求助30
46秒前
gjww应助whg采纳,获得10
51秒前
高分求助中
Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 4 Volume Set (ASM Books) 13th Edition 1000
Sport in der Antike 800
De arte gymnastica. The art of gymnastics 600
Berns Ziesemer - Maos deutscher Topagent: Wie China die Bundesrepublik eroberte 500
Stephen R. Mackinnon - Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary (2023) 500
Sport in der Antike Hardcover – March 1, 2015 500
Boris Pesce - Gli impiegati della Fiat dal 1955 al 1999 un percorso nella memoria 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2423018
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2111900
关于积分的说明 5347373
捐赠科研通 1839366
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 915645
版权声明 561239
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 489747