亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Endovascular therapy versus thrombolysis in patients with anterior circulation stroke in everyday clinical practice

作者
Andreas Kastrup,Freimuth Brunner,Katrin Wasser,Helmut Hildebrandt,Christoph Röth,Michael Winterhalter,Panagiotis Papanagiotou
出处
期刊:International Journal of Stroke [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:11 (5): 544-548 被引量:12
标识
DOI:10.1177/1747493016641948
摘要

BACKGROUND: In patients with large vessel occlusions, endovascular treatment has been shown to be superior to intravenous thrombolysis in recent trials. AIMS: The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of endovascular treatment on clinical and radiological outcome in everyday clinical practice. METHODS: We compared the rates of good outcome (modified Rankin scale ≤ 2 at discharge), in-hospital death, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages, and infarct sizes in patients with distal intracranial carotid artery, M1 and M2 occlusions during two time periods. RESULTS: From January 2008 to October 2012, a total of 509 patients were treated with intravenous thrombolysis and from November 2012 to December 2014, a total of 270 patients received endovascular treatment with stent retrievers (with or without intravenous thrombolysis). Significantly, more patients in the endovascular treatment group than in the intravenous thrombolysis group had a good outcome (37% vs. 27%, p < 0.01). The infarct sizes were significantly smaller after endovascular treatment than intravenous thrombolysis, whereas the symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages rates and in-hospital mortality were comparable between both treatment groups. The positive impact of endovascular treatment on clinical outcome was most pronounced in patients ≥75 years (31% endovascular treatment vs. 19% intravenous thrombolysis, p < 0.01), in patients with M1 occlusions (43% endovascular treatment vs. 25% intravenous thrombolysis, p < 0.01) and in patients with an admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ≥ 14 (24% endovascular treatment vs. 11% intravenous thrombolysis, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In everyday clinical practice and compared with intravenous thrombolysis, endovascular treatment significantly improved clinical outcome and was associated with smaller infarctions. This beneficial effect appeared to be highest in older patients, more severely affected patients, and in those with M1 occlusions.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
6秒前
Kao应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
Kao应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
Kao应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
黄花菜完成签到 ,获得积分0
14秒前
大模型应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
Kao应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
Kao应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
迅速的千风完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
22秒前
FashionBoy应助酷炫的大碗采纳,获得30
23秒前
26秒前
业业咪发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
33秒前
Inevitable发布了新的文献求助10
38秒前
breeze完成签到,获得积分10
39秒前
可爱的函函应助业业咪采纳,获得10
44秒前
科研通AI6.3应助didididm采纳,获得10
52秒前
危机的安容完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
不器完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
QXH完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
bkagyin应助梦里花落知多少采纳,获得10
1分钟前
酷炫的大碗完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
上官若男应助awa606采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
华仔应助reborn采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
董豆豆完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
董豆豆发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
awa606发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
Eric完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
情怀应助拓拓采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
852应助淡淡的雨文采纳,获得10
2分钟前
reborn发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Arthritis and Related Conditions, An Issue of Orthopedic Clinics 1000
Development of a Bridge Weigh-In-Motion System: A technology to convert the bridge response to the passage of traffic into data on vehicle configurations, speeds, times of travel and weights 1000
ズームレンズの光学設計に関する研究 800
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7289721
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8909119
关于积分的说明 18856409
捐赠科研通 6957764
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3209064
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2378801
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2184817