Endovascular therapy versus thrombolysis in patients with anterior circulation stroke in everyday clinical practice

作者
Andreas Kastrup,Freimuth Brunner,Katrin Wasser,Helmut Hildebrandt,Christoph Röth,Michael Winterhalter,Panagiotis Papanagiotou
出处
期刊:International Journal of Stroke [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:11 (5): 544-548 被引量:13
标识
DOI:10.1177/1747493016641948
摘要

BACKGROUND: In patients with large vessel occlusions, endovascular treatment has been shown to be superior to intravenous thrombolysis in recent trials. AIMS: The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of endovascular treatment on clinical and radiological outcome in everyday clinical practice. METHODS: We compared the rates of good outcome (modified Rankin scale ≤ 2 at discharge), in-hospital death, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages, and infarct sizes in patients with distal intracranial carotid artery, M1 and M2 occlusions during two time periods. RESULTS: From January 2008 to October 2012, a total of 509 patients were treated with intravenous thrombolysis and from November 2012 to December 2014, a total of 270 patients received endovascular treatment with stent retrievers (with or without intravenous thrombolysis). Significantly, more patients in the endovascular treatment group than in the intravenous thrombolysis group had a good outcome (37% vs. 27%, p < 0.01). The infarct sizes were significantly smaller after endovascular treatment than intravenous thrombolysis, whereas the symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages rates and in-hospital mortality were comparable between both treatment groups. The positive impact of endovascular treatment on clinical outcome was most pronounced in patients ≥75 years (31% endovascular treatment vs. 19% intravenous thrombolysis, p < 0.01), in patients with M1 occlusions (43% endovascular treatment vs. 25% intravenous thrombolysis, p < 0.01) and in patients with an admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ≥ 14 (24% endovascular treatment vs. 11% intravenous thrombolysis, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In everyday clinical practice and compared with intravenous thrombolysis, endovascular treatment significantly improved clinical outcome and was associated with smaller infarctions. This beneficial effect appeared to be highest in older patients, more severely affected patients, and in those with M1 occlusions.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
研友_VZG7GZ的应助被壮观的汝燕采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
dingth发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
小蘑菇的应助被王嘉俊采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
9528号完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
yiying完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
小咸鱼完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
赘婿的应助被ke采纳,获得10
3秒前
邢燕婷完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
自然雁风发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
wuyuhang发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
王彬发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
WW发布了新的文献求助20
4秒前
夜月残阳的应助被胡俊豪采纳,获得10
4秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被LLLKJ采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
情怀的应助被ccbns827采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
共享精神的应助被zz采纳,获得10
6秒前
babanihao完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被寂静沐风采纳,获得10
7秒前
所所的应助被yiying采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
zb完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
CodeCraft的应助被霡霂采纳,获得10
9秒前
Ran完成签到 ,获得积分0
9秒前
10秒前
Nae完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
大模型的应助被王帅斌采纳,获得10
12秒前
传奇3的应助被booniang采纳,获得10
12秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 1000
Электротехническая система магнитожидкостной герметизации валов регулируемых электродвигателей 800
Holistic Discourse Analysis, Second Edition by Robert E. Longacre 666
The Basics of Practical Optimization, Second Edition 600
Practical Nonconvex Nonsmooth Optimization 600
Problems and Solutions for Integer and Combinatorial Optimization: Building Skills in Discrete Optimization 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7979870
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9441851
关于积分的说明 21078551
捐赠科研通 7555169
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3375560
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2510195
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2408703