Hearing aids for mild to moderate hearing loss in adults

医学 听力损失 梅德林 奇纳 听力学 生活质量(医疗保健) 荟萃分析 随机对照试验 不利影响 助听器 临床试验 心理干预 护理部 外科 内科学 法学 政治学
作者
Melanie Ferguson,Pádraig Thomas Kitterick,Lee Yee Chong,Mark Edmondson‐Jones,Fiona Barker,Derek James Hoare
出处
期刊:The Cochrane library [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:2017 (8): CD012023-CD012023 被引量:379
标识
DOI:10.1002/14651858.cd012023.pub2
摘要

BACKGROUND: The main clinical intervention for mild to moderate hearing loss is the provision of hearing aids. These are routinely offered and fitted to those who seek help for hearing difficulties. By amplifying and improving access to sounds, and speech sounds in particular, the aim of hearing aid use is to reduce the negative consequences of hearing loss and improve participation in everyday life. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of hearing aids for mild to moderate hearing loss in adults. SEARCH METHODS: The Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the ENT Trials Register; the Cochrane Register of Studies Online; MEDLINE; PubMed; EMBASE; CINAHL; Web of Science; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 23 March 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of hearing aids compared to a passive or active control in adults with mild to moderate hearing loss. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. The primary outcomes in this review were hearing-specific health-related quality of life and the adverse effect pain. Secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life, listening ability and the adverse effect noise-induced hearing loss. We used GRADE to assess the quality of the evidence for each outcome; this is indicated in italics. MAIN RESULTS: We included five RCTs involving 825 participants. The studies were carried out in the USA and Europe, and were published between 1987 and 2017. Risk of bias across the studies varied. Most had low risk for selection, reporting and attrition bias, and a high risk for performance and detection bias because blinding was inadequate or absent.All participants had mild to moderate hearing loss. The average age across all five studies was between 69 and 83 years. The duration of the studies ranged between six weeks and six months.There was a large beneficial effect of hearing aids on hearing-specific health-related quality of life associated with participation in daily life as measured using the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE, scale range 1 to 100) compared to the unaided/placebo condition (mean difference (MD) -26.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) -42.16 to -10.77; 722 participants; three studies) (moderate-quality evidence).There was a small beneficial effect of hearing aids on general health-related quality of life (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.38, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.21; 568 participants; two studies) (moderate-quality evidence). There was a large beneficial effect of hearing aids on listening ability (SMD -1.88, 95% CI -3.24 to -0.52; 534 participants; two studies) (moderate-quality evidence).Adverse effects were measured in only one study (48 participants) and none were reported (very low-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence concurs that hearing aids are effective at improving hearing-specific health-related quality of life, general health-related quality of life and listening ability in adults with mild to moderate hearing loss. The evidence is compatible with the widespread provision of hearing aids as the first-line clinical management in those who seek help for hearing difficulties. Greater consistency is needed in the choice of outcome measures used to assess benefits from hearing aids. Further placebo-controlled studies would increase our confidence in the estimates of these effects and ascertain whether they vary according to age, gender, degree of hearing loss and type of hearing aid.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Curtis的应助被糖诗采纳,获得20
刚刚
刚刚
木目丶发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
小二郎的应助被俏皮夏天采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
咲韶完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
1秒前
yyuuxm发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
心灵美晓发布了新的文献求助20
1秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
11发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
WANG发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
学霸业的应助被忧郁忆枫采纳,获得10
2秒前
Q七发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
mzk发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
烟花的应助被厚芋泥啵啵奶茶采纳,获得10
2秒前
Curtis的应助被MinH0采纳,获得200
2秒前
Austrian完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
eiland发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Mint完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
dian完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
王彬发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
AlexM完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
只因完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
言午者发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
充电宝的应助被李魏采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
上官若男的应助被江凌采纳,获得10
4秒前
在水一方的应助被mont采纳,获得10
4秒前
阿伯茨的发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
小二郎的应助被春江花月夜采纳,获得10
4秒前
An发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Les Mantodea De Guyane 2000
Guidelines for fracture-safe and fatigue-reliable design of steel structures 600
Problems and Solutions for Integer and Combinatorial Optimization: Building Skills in Discrete Optimization 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Atelier, 2nd edition 500
Study of structural arctic steel in a friction pair with ice 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7998048
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9451744
关于积分的说明 21136185
捐赠科研通 7570984
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3380301
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2513531
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2414203