Diagnostic accuracy of self‐reported measures of periodontal disease: A clinical validation study using the 2017 case definitions

To clinically validate a self-reported questionnaire for periodontal disease and assess its accuracy for differentiating periodontal health and different stages of periodontitis.A Chinese (Cantonese) version of a self-reported questionnaire was prepared by translating and validating the original English questions proposed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/American Academy of Periodontology (CDC/AAP). The utility of the CDC/AAP questionnaire and its individual questions was assessed against a full-mouth periodontal examination. Periodontal case definition was based on the 2017 World Workshop classification of periodontal diseases. Multivariable logistic regression and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis were performed to assess the accuracy of the questionnaire.408 subjects enrolled in this study, including those with periodontal health (16.2%), gingivitis (15.2%), Stages I/II periodontitis (31.8%) and Stages III/IV periodontitis (36.8%). Overall, the questionnaire had poor accuracy in detecting the presence of Stages I/II periodontitis with an AUROC 0.608. While it showed moderate to high accuracy for identifying periodontal disease (gingivitis and periodontitis), periodontitis and Stages III/IV periodontitis with an AUROC of 0.837, 0.803 and 0.870, respectively. Self-reported measures in combination with age and tobacco smoking showed excellent performance for identifying Stages III/IV periodontitis with a high AUROC of 0.953, a sensitivity of 95.7%, and a specificity of 89.0%. Specific questions and combinations provided greater utility to discriminate the various periodontal case definitions.The self-reported CDC/AAP questionnaire may be a feasible tool for detecting periodontitis, and its combination with demographic and lifestyle factors is useful for the identification of individuals with Stages III/IV periodontitis. This questionnaire seems less helpful in screening of Stages I/II periodontitis. Further studies are needed to test the validity in larger community-based populations.