不平等
种族(生物学)
合法性
主流
社会不平等
劣势
社会心理学
心理学
社会学
性别研究
政治学
数学
计算机科学
人工智能
数学分析
政治
法学
作者
Sora Jun,Rosalind M Chow,A Maurits van der Veen,Erik Bleich
标识
DOI:10.1073/pnas.2110712119
摘要
Significance How social inequality is described—as advantage or disadvantage—critically shapes individuals’ responses to it. As such, it is important to document how people, in fact, choose to describe inequality. Using multiple methods and research contexts, we find that race and gender inequalities are chronically described as subordinate groups’ disadvantages, whereas wealth inequality is chronically described using no frame or as the dominant group’s advantage. Moreover, these differences in chronic frames are related to the perceived legitimacy of the inequality domain. The presence of such chronic frames and their association with perceived legitimacy may be mechanisms underlying the systematic inattention to White individuals’ and men’s advantages, and the disadvantages of the working class.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI