Risk-Based Decision-Making Fallacies: Why Present Functional Safety Standards are Not Enough

风险分析(工程) 功能安全 系统安全 危险和可操作性研究 安全标准 过程(计算) 计算机科学 生命关键系统 风险评估 感知 风险管理 安全文化 计算机安全 软件 工程类 可靠性工程 心理学 业务 软件工程 可操作性 财务 神经科学 程序设计语言 操作系统 管理 经济
作者
Andreas Johnsen,Gordana Dodig-Crnković,Kristina Lundqvist,Kaj Hänninen,Paul Pettersson
标识
DOI:10.1109/icsaw.2017.50
摘要

Functional safety of a system is the part of its overall safety that depends on the system operating correctly in response to its inputs. Safety is defined as the absence of unacceptable/unreasonable risk by functional safety standards, which enforce safety requirements in each phase of the development process of safety-critical software and hardware systems. Acceptability of risks is judged within a framework of analysis with contextual and cultural aspects by individuals who may introduce subjectivity and misconceptions in the assessment. While functional safety standards elaborate much on the avoidance of unreasonable risk in the development of safety-critical software and hardware systems, little is addressed on the issue of avoiding unreasonable judgments of risk. Through the studies of common fallacies in risk perception and ethics, we present a moral-psychological analysis of functional safety standards and propose plausible improvements of the involved risk-related decision making processes, with a focus on the notion of an acceptable residual risk. As a functional safety reference model, we use the functional safety standard ISO 26262, which addresses potential hazards caused by malfunctions of software and hardware systems within road vehicles and defines safety measures that are required to achieve an acceptable level of safety. The analysis points out the critical importance of a robust safety culture with developed countermeasures to the common fallacies in risk perception, which are not addressed by contemporary functional safety standards. We argue that functional safety standards should be complemented with the analysis of potential hazards caused by fallacies in risk perception, their countermeasures, and the requirement that residual risks must be explicated, motivated, and accompanied by a plan for their continuous reduction. This approach becomes especially important in contemporary developed autonomous vehicles with increasing computational control by increasingly intelligent software applications.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
不重要的人完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
1秒前
zd完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
zhaowensen完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
抗体药物偶联完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
13333完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
CipherSage应助pete采纳,获得10
3秒前
冷静菠萝发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
archer完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
一语初晴完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Derik发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
风轩轩发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
科研力力发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
小k完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
对方正在输入完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
云云发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
xxxxxu发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
木槿完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
喜多米430完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
尼仲星完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
科研力力完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
二二发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
15秒前
活力安南发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
yesterdayffy发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
李敬语完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
可可豆战士发布了新的文献求助100
16秒前
温婉的凝芙完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
97完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
舒心白山完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
思源应助坚定的冷雁采纳,获得10
18秒前
19秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals 800
Chemistry and Physics of Carbon Volume 18 800
The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals 800
Leading Academic-Practice Partnerships in Nursing and Healthcare: A Paradigm for Change 800
The formation of Australian attitudes towards China, 1918-1941 640
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6437611
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8252025
关于积分的说明 17558192
捐赠科研通 5496058
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2898627
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1875337
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1716355