Risk-Based Decision-Making Fallacies: Why Present Functional Safety Standards are Not Enough

风险分析(工程) 功能安全 系统安全 危险和可操作性研究 安全标准 过程(计算) 计算机科学 生命关键系统 风险评估 感知 风险管理 安全文化 计算机安全 软件 工程类 可靠性工程 心理学 业务 软件工程 可操作性 操作系统 经济 神经科学 管理 程序设计语言 财务
作者
Andreas Johnsen,Gordana Dodig-Crnković,Kristina Lundqvist,Kaj Hänninen,Paul Pettersson
标识
DOI:10.1109/icsaw.2017.50
摘要

Functional safety of a system is the part of its overall safety that depends on the system operating correctly in response to its inputs. Safety is defined as the absence of unacceptable/unreasonable risk by functional safety standards, which enforce safety requirements in each phase of the development process of safety-critical software and hardware systems. Acceptability of risks is judged within a framework of analysis with contextual and cultural aspects by individuals who may introduce subjectivity and misconceptions in the assessment. While functional safety standards elaborate much on the avoidance of unreasonable risk in the development of safety-critical software and hardware systems, little is addressed on the issue of avoiding unreasonable judgments of risk. Through the studies of common fallacies in risk perception and ethics, we present a moral-psychological analysis of functional safety standards and propose plausible improvements of the involved risk-related decision making processes, with a focus on the notion of an acceptable residual risk. As a functional safety reference model, we use the functional safety standard ISO 26262, which addresses potential hazards caused by malfunctions of software and hardware systems within road vehicles and defines safety measures that are required to achieve an acceptable level of safety. The analysis points out the critical importance of a robust safety culture with developed countermeasures to the common fallacies in risk perception, which are not addressed by contemporary functional safety standards. We argue that functional safety standards should be complemented with the analysis of potential hazards caused by fallacies in risk perception, their countermeasures, and the requirement that residual risks must be explicated, motivated, and accompanied by a plan for their continuous reduction. This approach becomes especially important in contemporary developed autonomous vehicles with increasing computational control by increasingly intelligent software applications.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
饱满的书文完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
3秒前
qi完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
Una完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
王小鱼完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
liujingxuan发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
ri_290完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
开心的人杰完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
Peter完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
pepsi完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
小白完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
luo完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
周周周完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
hanlixuan完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
科研小白完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
醉月舞阳完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
21秒前
心灵美的觅夏完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
Visiony完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
明天完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
香蕉面包完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
ira完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
fu发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
舒适涵山完成签到,获得积分0
27秒前
Zero、完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
风中星月完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
查资料完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
老迟到的小松鼠完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
dldldl完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
34秒前
asipilin完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
卢传成完成签到 ,获得积分10
38秒前
charry完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
hdrizen完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
8D完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
44秒前
Bruce完成签到,获得积分10
45秒前
柳橙完成签到 ,获得积分10
50秒前
高分求助中
On lateral buckling of armouring wires in flexible pipes 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 700
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7744743
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9292511
关于积分的说明 20213395
捐赠科研通 7323724
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3307647
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2459632
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2318718