University Students’ Understanding of Chemical Thermodynamics

心理学 数学教育 化学 医学教育 医学
作者
Bellam Sreenivasulu,R. Subramaniam
出处
期刊:International Journal of Science Education [Taylor & Francis]
卷期号:35 (4): 601-635 被引量:75
标识
DOI:10.1080/09500693.2012.683460
摘要

Abstract This study explored undergraduate students’ understanding of the chemistry topic of thermodynamics using a 4-tier diagnostic instrument, comprising 30 questions, and follow-up interviews. An additional objective of the study was to assess the utility of the 4-tier instrument for use in studies on alternative conceptions (ACs) as there has been no study done on it since its introduction in the literature in the year 2010. A total of 296 students majoring in Chemistry at a university in Singapore participated in this study—88 students in the preliminary study, 102 students in the pilot study and 106 students in the main study. This article reports on the results obtained with students in the main study; their age ranges from 20 to 22 years. Comprising answer and reason tiers plus associated confidence ratings, the 4-tier diagnostic instrument enabled the eliciting of 34 ACs harbored by the undergraduates as well as the strengths of these ACs. Of concern to note is that even for questions which were answered correctly, the mean confidence was not very high. The results of this study reiterate the point that thermodynamics is a topic fraught with conceptual difficulties and ACs. Based on the results from this study, the potential of the 4-tier test for AC studies is further underscored. Some implications of the study are discussed. Keywords: ThermodynamicsAlternative conceptionsFour-tier diagnostic instrumentConfidence ratingsUniversity students Acknowledgements We acknowledge financial support in the form of a Teaching Enhancement Grant (C-143-000-019-001) from the Center for Development of Teaching and Learning, National University of Singapore, for this study. We are also thankful to Honours students, Lim Ting Liang and Chin Chia Keat, for their assistance in this study. We thank the two reviewers and the editor, Dr Rosaria Justi, for their careful reading of our manuscript and for offering several constructive and valuable comments that have helped us to significantly improve our article.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Ste完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
吴DrYDYY发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
零序1发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
Liver发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
汉堡包的应助被十四说四十采纳,获得10
6秒前
鱼儿完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
Y888888的应助被SUN采纳,获得30
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
兴奋尔白发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
大小多少发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
思源的应助被去下一场派对采纳,获得30
9秒前
aajhajkahna的应助被00hello00采纳,获得10
9秒前
1555发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
勤劳莹芝发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被xflei采纳,获得10
10秒前
Awari发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
12秒前
Zyk发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
GAP发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
行知完成签到,获得积分20
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
16秒前
lin发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
执着的新烟完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
Jovinx完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
奋斗莫茗完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
LAN完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
留胡子的听枫完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
偉偉发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
Unpaid完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Energie-Contracting 1500
Klimaschutzrecht durch den Energiesektor im Mehrebenensystem – Ein Rechtsvergleich 1000
Stochastic Models in Operations Research,Vol. 2 600
Critical Bildung: Hegel and the Logic of Diremption 500
桑白皮エキスの実験的, 臨床的育毛効果について 500
Qualitative Methodologies in Tourism Studies: Disrupting and Co-creating Critical Research 350
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8038486
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9473565
关于积分的说明 21266827
捐赠科研通 7607579
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3390713
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2522250
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2428138