一般健康问卷
接收机工作特性
利克特量表
焦虑
医学
精神科
心理学
临床心理学
统计
内科学
数学
出处
期刊:Chin J Psychiatry
日期:2012-12-05
卷期号:45 (06): 349-353
被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7884.2012.06.007
摘要
Objective
To explore the best thresholds and the screening features among the three scoring methods of the GHQ-12.
Methods
The sample was a qualify control data of epidemiological survey of mental disorders in Xiamen, and the tools of the GHQ-12 for the screening, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-Ⅳ Axis Ⅰ Disorders-Patient Edition for the diagnosis, and the sensitivity, specificity and the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic cure were analyzed.
Results
1004 subjects completed the screening and the diagnosis, and the total score of CHQ by Liker scoring method was the highest, and C-GHQ scoring method was larger than GHQ standard method (χ2=1970.89,P<0.01).The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic cure for the standard scoring method was 0.780, the Likert scoring method and the C-GHQ scoring method were 0.811, 0.809 respectively. Among the threshold 1/12 with GHQ standard method, (11-12)/36 with Likert method, 5/12 with C-GHQ method, the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic cure for the mood disorders was highest, and anxiety disorders was larger than organic mental disorders.
Conclusion
The best thresholds score with the standard scoring method is 1/12, the Likert scoring method and the C-GHQ scoring method are (11-12)/36, 5/12 respectively. The three scoring methods are the most suitable to screen mood disorders with high stability. The three scoring methods show different screening features, and should be selected according to their research purposes.
Key words:
Mental disorders; ROC curve; Epidemiology; Questionnaires
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI