医学
结肠镜检查
养生
腺瘤
内科学
随机对照试验
退出时间
胃肠病学
结直肠癌
临床终点
相对风险
外科
癌症
置信区间
作者
Franco Radaelli,Silvia Paggi,Cesare Hassan,Carlo Senore,R. Fasoli,Andrea Anderloni,Federico Buffoli,Maria Flavia Savarese,Giancarlo Spinzi,Douglas K. Rex,Alessandro Repici
出处
期刊:Gut
[BMJ]
日期:2015-12-09
卷期号:66 (2): 270-277
被引量:135
标识
DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310685
摘要
Objective
Although a split regimen of bowel preparation has been associated with higher levels of bowel cleansing, it is still uncertain whether it has a favourable effect on the adenoma detection rate (ADR). The present study was aimed at evaluating whether a split regimen was superior to the traditional 'full-dose, day-before' regimen in terms of ADR. Design
In a multicentre, randomised, endoscopist-blinded study, 50–69-year-old subjects undergoing first colonoscopy after positive-faecal immunochemical test within an organised colorectal cancer organised screening programmes were 1:1 randomised to receive low-volume 2-L polyethylene glycol (PEG)-ascorbate solution in a 'split-dose' (Split-Dose Group, SDG) or 'day-before' regimen (Day-Before Group, DBG). The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects with at least one adenoma. Secondary endpoints were the detection rates of advanced adenomas and serrated lesions at per-patient analysis and the total number of lesions. Results
690 subjects were included in the study. At per-patient analysis, the proportion of subjects with at least one adenoma was significantly higher in the SDG than in the DBG (183/345, 53.0% vs 141/345, 40.9%, relative risk (RR) 1.22, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.46); corresponding figures for advanced adenomas were 26.4% (91/345) versus 20.0% (69/345, RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.73). At per-polyp analysis, the total numbers of both adenomas and advanced adenomas per subject were significantly higher in the SDG (1.15 vs 0.8, p <0.001; 0.36 vs 0.22, p<0.001). Conclusions
In an organised screening setting, the adoption of a split regimen resulted into a higher detection rate of clinically relevant neoplastic lesions, thus improving the effectiveness of colonoscopy. Based on such evidence, the adoption of a split regimen for colonoscopy should be strongly recommended. Clinical trial registration number
NCT02178033.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI