生物等效性
埃索美拉唑
最大值
医学
药代动力学
交叉研究
置信区间
不利影响
随机对照试验
药理学
内科学
安慰剂
病理
替代医学
作者
Xuefeng Zhong,Gan Zhou,Su‐Mei Xu,Xiaomin Li,Ying Xu,Wanli Liu,Yanxin Zhang,Lin‐Cong He,Qiuying Shen,Ping‐Sheng Xu
摘要
Abstract This study was designed to evaluate the bioequivalence of the newly developed delayed‐release oral suspension (test) 40 mg esomeprazole magnesium compared to its marketed counterpart (40 mg; reference) in healthy adult Chinese subjects. We conducted randomized, open‐label, two‐period, single‐dose, two‐way crossover trials over a 7‐day washout period, comprising a fasting trial and a fed trial. The subjects were administered the test or reference products in a 1:1 ratio at random throughout each period. Then, in the next session, they received the alternate products. Liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry and WinNonlin software were used to assess the bioequivalence of esomeprazole peak plasma concentration (C max ) and area under the concentration–time curve (AUC). Overall, 33 subjects participated in the fasting trial and 42 subjects participated in the fed trial. Under both situations, the 90% confidence interval for the ratio of geometric means of C max , AUC 0‐t , and AUC 0‐∞ were within equivalence ranges (80%–125%). In these trials, no severe adverse events or protocol violations were observed. Moreover, when esomeprazole was administered while fed, the t max was delayed, and both C max and AUC were reduced. The results of this research suggest that the test and reference formulations were bioequivalent under fasting and fed states.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI