生物等效性
交叉研究
医学
药理学
数学
药代动力学
剂型
置信区间
色谱法
安慰剂
化学
内科学
病理
替代医学
作者
Manuel Cánovas,Marta Arcabell,Gemma Rojo‐Martínez,Mireia Canals,Francesc Cabré
出处
期刊:Drug Research
[Thieme Medical Publishers (Germany)]
日期:2012-02-06
卷期号:61 (11): 610-616
被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1055/s-0031-1300563
摘要
Two studies were conducted in order to assess the bioequivalence of montelukast (CAS 151767-02-1) 10 mg film-coated tablet (FCT) and 5 mg chewable tablet (CT) test formulations in comparison with the original brands. Under fasting conditions, healthy male and female volunteers received one 10 mg FCT or 5 mg CT orally as a single dose of a test or reference formulation. Both studies were designed as open-label, randomized, two-period, two-sequence, crossover studies with a 7-day washout interval. Plasma samples were collected up to 24 h after drug administration and montelukast levels were determined by a validated LC/MS/MS method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental analysis and were statistically compared by analysis of variance for test and reference formulation. Bioequivalence between products was determined by calculating 90% confidence interval of the ratio test/reference of least-square means of logarithmically transformed Cmax and AUC0–t parameters. AUC0–∞ was also analysed to obtain additional information. The calculated 90% confidence intervals for the ratios of Cmax and AUC0–t parameters were 89.33–110.52 and 92.06–109.46, respectively, in the FCT study, and 91.58–101.86 and 92.15–98.83, respectively, in the CT study, which are all within the bioequivalence acceptance range of 80–125%. Based on the results, it can be concluded that the evaluated test FCT and CT formulations are bioequivalent to their respective reference formulation in terms of rate and extent of absorption.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI