无粘流
马赫数
可压缩流
数学
稳健性(进化)
有限体积法
离散化
马赫反射
压缩性
各向同性
应用数学
数学分析
机械
物理
马赫波
化学
基因
生物化学
量子力学
作者
Xiaojian Yang,Xing Ji,Wei Shyy,Kun Xu
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110706
摘要
In this paper, a comparison of the performance of two high-order finite volume methods based on the gas-kinetic scheme (GKS) and HLLC fluxes is carried out on structured rectangular mesh. For both schemes, the fifth-order WENO-AO reconstruction is adopted to achieve a high-order spatial accuracy. In terms of temporal discretization, a two-stage fourth-order (S2O4) time marching strategy is adopted for WENO5-AO-GKS scheme, and the fourth-order Runge-Kutta (RK4) method is employed for WENO5-AO-HLLC scheme. For the viscous flow computation, the GKS includes both inviscid and viscous fluxes in the evolution of a single cell interface gas distribution function. While for the WENO5-AO-HLLC scheme, the inviscid flux is provided by HLLC Riemann solver, and the viscous flux is discretized by a sixth-order central difference method. Based on the tests of forward Mach step, double Mach reflection, and viscous shock tube, both schemes show outstanding shock capturing property. From the Titarev-Toro and double shear layer tests, WENO5-AO-GKS scheme seems to have a better resolution than WENO5-AO-HLLC scheme. Both schemes show excellent robustness in extreme cases, such as the Le Blanc problem. From the cases of the Noh problem and the compressible isotropic turbulence, WENO5-AO-GKS scheme shows favorite robustness. In the compressible isotropic turbulence and three-dimensional Taylor-Green vortex problems, WENO-AO-GKS can use a CFL number up to 0.5, instead of 0.3 for WENO5-AO-HLLC. In terms of computational efficiency, WENO5-AO-HLLC scheme is about 27% more expensive than WENO5-AO-GKS scheme in the two-dimensional viscous flow problems, but is about 15% faster in the three-dimensional case, because WENO5-AO-GKS scheme needs multidimensional spatial reconstruction for flow variables in both one normal and two tangential directions in the 3D case. Due to the multi-dimensionality, WENO5-AO-GKS scheme shows better resolution than WENO5-AO-HLLC scheme in the laminar boundary layer and the double shear layer test.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI