AI Versus Human-Delivered Online Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety Symptoms in Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

焦虑 随机对照试验 认知行为疗法 心理干预 临床心理学 干预(咨询) 认知疗法 探索性研究 认知 心理学 医学 认知重构 定性研究 年轻人 临床试验 物理疗法 自我效能感 计算机辅助网络访谈 精神科 梅德林
作者
Weihao Huang,Yiyang Wu,Yujin Shen,Haoran Song,Yuehua Chen,Ruoyu Lin,Yue Wang,X H Yang
出处
期刊:Healthcare [Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute]
卷期号:14 (10): 1325-1325
标识
DOI:10.3390/healthcare14101325
摘要

Objective: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of online cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) delivered by an AI chatbot versus human peer counselors (participants were told it was AI) in reducing anxiety symptoms in young adults. Methods: Ninety young adults with mild-to-severe anxiety were randomized to a 4-week intervention of AI-CBT (n = 30), peer-counselor-CBT (n = 30), or a no-intervention control (n = 30). The primary outcome, anxiety, was assessed at baseline, mid-point, and post-intervention. Secondary outcomes (the self-efficacy for exercise, sleep quality), psychotherapy benefit, and qualitative user experiences were also evaluated. Results: Both AI and human-delivered interventions led to significant within-group reductions in anxiety (p < 0.05). However, in the primary intention-to-treat analysis, neither intervention demonstrated a statistically significant advantage over the no-intervention control group at post-intervention. A secondary per-protocol analysis suggested a benefit for the human-delivered intervention among study completers. Notably, participants in the AI group reported significantly lower perceived treatment benefit than the human group (p < 0.001). Qualitative analyses indicated that while AI was valued for accessibility and consistency, human intervention was perceived as more flexible in guidance, individualized, emotionally supportive, and conducive to deeper exploration. Conclusions: In this exploratory trial, both AI- and peer-counselor-CBT showed within-group promise, but the evidence does not support their efficacy over a no-intervention control. The AI’s limitations in providing flexible, emotionally supportive, and personalized interaction likely explain the efficacy gap observed between the two interventions. While AI may serve as a scalable support tool, claims of clinical efficacy require significant caution. These preliminary findings warrant replication in a prospectively registered confirmatory trial.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
1秒前
Criminology34的应助被云隐采纳,获得10
1秒前
ssll完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
在水一方的应助被小厂长QwQ采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
烟王之王发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
ZhangZhexuan完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
郑靖楠发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
华仔的应助被小苹果采纳,获得10
6秒前
张张发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
molihuakai的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
酷波er的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
彭于晏的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
NN的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
领导范儿的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
汉堡包的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
aajhajkahna的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
CodeCraft的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得30
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
共享精神的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
2425发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
大模型的应助被AA采纳,获得10
8秒前
酷波er的应助被专注的惜天采纳,获得10
8秒前
卷清发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
浅色西完成签到,获得积分0
9秒前
Ava的应助被lipppfff采纳,获得10
9秒前
wubobo发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
清话鹿酒完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
zhuo发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
junkround完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)通过应助OA文献获取积分 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Arbitrage Theory in Discrete and Continuous Time 500
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 400
English Longitudinal Study of Ageing: Waves 0-11, 1998-2024 300
2026-2030年中國基因檢測行業市場前瞻與未來投資戰略分析報告 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 化学工程 内科学 物理 生物化学 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 人工智能 心理学 无机化学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7825772
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9352085
关于积分的说明 20564914
捐赠科研通 7419250
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3334901
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2480159
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2355401