Sentinel lymph node sampling versus full lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer: a SEER database analysis

医学 子宫内膜癌 淋巴结切除术 淋巴结 前哨淋巴结 内科学 采样(信号处理) 癌症 肿瘤科 乳腺癌 计算机视觉 计算机科学 滤波器(信号处理)
作者
Chen Nahshon,Yfat Kadan,Ofer Lavie,Ludmila Ostrovsky,Yakir Segev
出处
期刊:International Journal of Gynecological Cancer [BMJ]
卷期号:33 (10): 1557-1563 被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1136/ijgc-2023-004474
摘要

Objective To assess the long term outcomes and prognosis of sentinel lymph node sampling compared with full lymph node dissection in endometrial cancer patients. Methods We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for information on women diagnosed with endometrial cancer from 2010 to 2019. We conducted a comparison including overall survival between patients who had undergone sentinel lymph node sampling only and patients who had undergone formal lymph node dissection. Propensity score matching was performed according to the patient’s age, type of endometrial cancer, grade and stage of disease, and adjuvant therapy. Subgroup analyses were performed according to type and grade of endometrial cancer. Results 41411 endometrial cancer patients were identified through the database. After matching, 6019 patients each were included in the sentinel lymph node and lymph node dissection groups. Median (interquartile range (IQR)) follow-up time was 16 (7-31) months in both groups. One year survival rates were longer in the sentinel lymph node group compared with the lymph node dissection group (hazard ratio (HR) 1.61 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17 to 2.21); p=0.004). Subgroups analysis according to grade of disease showed that 1 year survival rates were longer in the sentinel lymph node group in patients with endometrioid-type grade 1–2 endometrial cancer (HR 1.70 (95% CI 1.31 to 2.56); p=0.01), while no difference in survival was found between the sentinel lymph node and lymph node dissection groups in the subgroup of patients with high grade endometrial cancer (HR 1.40 (95%CI 0.94 to 2.24); p=0.17). In patients with low grade endometrial cancer included in the sentinel lymph node group, only 7% had lymph nodes positive for malignancy compared with 17% in the high grade group. Conclusion Survival rates were not compromised in endometrial cancer patients undergoing sentinel lymph node sampling versus full lymph node dissection for all grades of disease.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
sxw完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
茶色玻璃完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
momo树完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
fhgosdfh完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
陈强强完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
hqh发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
颜千琴完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
6秒前
qq完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
酷波er应助Xyy采纳,获得10
7秒前
丘比特应助菜秧子采纳,获得10
8秒前
留柿完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
科研民工花儿完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
老实凝蕊完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
代dai发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
小二郎应助ww采纳,获得10
14秒前
xin完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
look发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
15秒前
一介书生应助热心小蕊采纳,获得10
15秒前
唠叨的大门应助火白羽采纳,获得10
15秒前
18秒前
18秒前
笑笑笑笑笑完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
sxw发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
小蒋完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
思源应助记性半小时采纳,获得10
19秒前
xiao完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
21秒前
菜秧子发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
科研通AI6.4应助小七采纳,获得10
22秒前
魔人啾啾完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
23秒前
111完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
A Psychological Understanding of Criticism and Mental Health 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7752734
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9299707
关于积分的说明 20253694
捐赠科研通 7334912
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3310309
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2461621
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2323174