Health care professionals' experiences of pain management in the intensive care unit: a qualitative study

医学 重症监护 主题分析 医疗保健 护理部 疼痛评估 人口 重症监护室 工作量 定性研究 确认 梅德林 非概率抽样 疼痛管理 物理疗法 精神科 重症监护医学 社会科学 计算机安全 环境卫生 社会学 计算机科学 政治学 法学 经济 经济增长 操作系统
作者
Achyut K. Bhattacharyya,Helen Laycock,Stephen Brett,Frazier Beatty,Harriet Kemp
出处
期刊:Anaesthesia [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/anae.16209
摘要

Summary Despite the existence of evidence‐based guidelines for the assessment and management of pain in the critical care setting, the prevalence of acute pain remains high. Inadequate pain management is associated with longer duration of mechanical ventilation, reduced capacity for rehabilitation and long‐term psychological sequelae. This study aimed to describe the experiences of pain management from healthcare professionals working in intensive care units. Healthcare professionals were recruited from intensive care units in London, UK using a purposive sampling technique. Semi‐structured interviews were transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis technique. Thirty participants were recruited from eight diverse intensive care units. Five themes were identified. First, there was a lack of consensus in pain assessment in the ICU where nursing staff described more knowledge and confidence of validated pain measures than physicians, and concerns over validity and usability were raised. Second, there was a universal perception of resource availability impacting the quality of pain management including high clinical workload, staff turnover and availability of certain pain management techniques. Third, acknowledgement of the importance of pain management was highest in those with experience of interacting with critical care survivors. Fourth, participants described their own emotional reaction to managing those in pain which influenced their learning. Finally, there was a perception that, due to the complexity of the intensive care unit population, pain was de‐prioritised and there were conflicting views as to whether standardised analgosedation algorithms were useful. This study provides evidence to suggest interdisciplinary training, collaboratively designed decision‐making tools, prioritisation initiatives and research priorities are areas that could be targeted to improve pain management in critical care.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
大天才卡莲博士完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
宁寻凝发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
cctv18应助俺来了采纳,获得10
4秒前
cctv18应助杨知意采纳,获得30
5秒前
cctv18应助繁华采纳,获得10
6秒前
良辰美景完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
王志斌完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
乐乐应助ccc采纳,获得10
10秒前
宁寻凝完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
傅以柳完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
含蓄雪碧发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
人间龙鹏发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
不安豁完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
星辰大海应助糖糖钰采纳,获得10
14秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助liliy采纳,获得10
15秒前
文献求助完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
不安青牛应助书篆采纳,获得10
21秒前
21秒前
23秒前
可爱迪应助aaaaaa采纳,获得20
23秒前
甜甜玫瑰应助Rita采纳,获得10
24秒前
cctv18应助繁华采纳,获得10
24秒前
852应助良辰美景采纳,获得10
24秒前
DUOMI发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
ajie完成签到,获得积分20
26秒前
30秒前
30秒前
30秒前
走了皮皮猪完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
香蕉觅云应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
33秒前
深情安青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
33秒前
酷波er应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
33秒前
cctv18应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
33秒前
所所应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
33秒前
领导范儿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
33秒前
Ava应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
33秒前
anpabc应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
33秒前
sars518应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
33秒前
kkxxyyy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
33秒前
高分求助中
One Man Talking: Selected Essays of Shao Xunmei, 1929–1939 1000
Yuwu Song, Biographical Dictionary of the People's Republic of China 700
[Lambert-Eaton syndrome without calcium channel autoantibodies] 520
Sphäroguß als Werkstoff für Behälter zur Beförderung, Zwischen- und Endlagerung radioaktiver Stoffe - Untersuchung zu alternativen Eignungsnachweisen: Zusammenfassender Abschlußbericht 500
少脉山油柑叶的化学成分研究 430
Sport 400
Revolutions 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2454211
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2126086
关于积分的说明 5414565
捐赠科研通 1854727
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 922438
版权声明 562340
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 493555