Linear-Array Endoscopic Ultrasound and Narrow-Band Imaging Measure the Invasion Depth of Nonpedunculated Rectal Lesions With Comparable Accuracy Based on a Randomized Controlled Trial

医学 窄带成像 随机对照试验 度量(数据仓库) 放射科 超声波 内镜超声 核医学 内窥镜检查 外科 数据挖掘 计算机科学
作者
Lingzhi Li,Jiaming He,Haiyan Hu,Yinghong Wang,Weixin Li,Shao Hui Huang,Jahan Rownoak,Shenglin Xu,Fang Xie,Junfen Wang,Wenting Mi,Jianqun Cai,Yaping Ye,Side Liu,Jing Wang,Yue Li
出处
期刊:The American Journal of Gastroenterology [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
标识
DOI:10.14309/ajg.0000000000002975
摘要

INTRODUCTION: Linear-array endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and narrow-band imaging (NBI) are both used to estimate the invasion depth of nonpedunculated rectal lesions (NPRLs). However, it is unclear which procedure is more accurate. This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of linear EUS and NBI for estimating the invasion depth of NPRLs. METHODS: This study is a single-center, randomized, tandem trial. Eligible patients with NPRLs were randomly assigned to A group (assessment with EUS followed by NBI) or B group (assessment with NBI followed by EUS). The invasion depth of each lesion was independently measured by each procedure and categorized as mucosal to slight submucosal (M-SM s , invasion depth <1,000 μm) or deep submucosal (SM d , invasion depth ≥1,000 μm) invasion, with postoperative pathology as the standard of measurement. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy, and secondary outcomes included sensitivity, specificity, and procedure time. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients with NPRLs were enrolled, and 79 patients were finally analyzed, including 39 cases in the A group and 40 cases in the B group. Comparable diagnostic accuracies were observed between EUS and NBI (96.2% vs 93.7%, P = 0.625). EUS identified lesions with deep submucosal invasion with 81.8% sensitivity while that of NBI was 63.6% ( P = 0.500). The specificity of both EUS and NBI was 98.5%. The procedure time was also similar between EUS and NBI (5.90 ± 3.44 vs 6.4 ± 3.94 minutes, P = 0.450). Furthermore, the combined use of EUS and NBI did not improve diagnostic accuracy compared with EUS or NBI alone (94.9% vs 96.2% vs 93.7%, P = 0.333). DISCUSSION: Linear EUS and NBI measure the invasion depth of NPRLs with comparable accuracy. The combination of the 2 methods does not improve the diagnostic accuracy. Single NBI should be preferred, considering its simplicity and convenience in clinical practice.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
乐宝完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
科目三应助州府十三采纳,获得10
刚刚
xiao发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
落雪无痕发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
躬身入局发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
胡图图发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
奋斗雨灵完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
东方元语发布了新的文献求助20
3秒前
我去吃饭发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
yaya完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
wendy完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
ddd关闭了ddd文献求助
5秒前
somehow完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
9秒前
美丽谷槐完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
荔枝柚子完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
鳗鱼惋庭发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
DoubleJing发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
orixero应助shiyaouao采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
12秒前
seven7发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
Surge完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
胡图图发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
aaa发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
汤姆应助爆米花采纳,获得50
17秒前
科研通AI2S应助聂建宇采纳,获得10
17秒前
天晴应助大智若愚采纳,获得10
17秒前
18秒前
寒冷悟空完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
模型平均及其应用 900
Nondestructive Testing Handbook: Vol. 4, Thermal and Infrared Testing (IR), 4th ed 800
作者名:Kristopher P. Plain,悉尼大学的,目前只能查到其四篇论文,想找到其博士论文 590
Évora na Idade Média 555
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Structural Analysis 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7353305
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8964377
关于积分的说明 19045358
捐赠科研通 7001929
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3221666
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2386157
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2202271