Effectiveness of meaning‐centered interventions on existential distress and mental health outcomes in cancer survivors and their family caregivers: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract Background Cancer is a global public health concern that causes psychosocial and spiritual challenges in those who suffer from it and their family caregivers. Meaning‐centered interventions have a positive impact on improving anxiety and depression in patients with advanced cancer. However, the impact of meaning‐centered interventions on existential distress of patients with cancer and family caregivers' mental health is still unclear. Aims To examine the efficacy of meaning‐centered interventions in alleviating existential distress, enhancing quality of life, and fostering a sense of meaning among cancer survivors and their family caregivers. Methods This systematic review and meta‐analysis were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analysis 2020 statement. A comprehensive search was conducted from inception until September 2023 across nine databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, WANFANG, and CNKI. Heterogeneity testing and meta‐analyses were conducted using Review Manger 5.3. We calculated standard mean deviations and 95% confidence intervals and presented forest plots for assessing intervention effects. Two reviewers independently evaluated the risk of bias of all included articles. STATA 17.0 was used for publication bias analysis. Results The review included 25 studies with 2399 participants, and 22 were included in the meta‐analysis. Meaning‐centered interventions enhanced quality of life, alleviated existential distress, and reduced depressive symptoms and cancer‐related fatigue. They did not affect spiritual well‐being. The subgroup analysis showed that the individual form and long‐term intervention (≥3 months) enhanced the quality of life in cancer survivors. Meaning‐centered interventions reduce depression in advanced cancer survivors more than in mixed‐stage cancer survivors. Meaning‐centered interventions significantly enhanced benefit finding for family caregivers. Linking Evidence to Action Meaning‐centered interventions may improve mental health for patients with cancer and their family caregivers. Future research must include diverse cultural perspectives to understand the impact of meaning‐centered interventions on various groups.